1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ale4655 [162]
3 years ago
15

POINTS POINTS HELP PLZ AGAIN

History
1 answer:
Alborosie3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Option: D) Slave owners demanded rights they refused to be denied.                            

Explanation:

Both the two compromises are thirty years apart, but some of its features remained common. Missouri Compromise of 1820 became the first compromise in the country between the states favouring and those opposing slavery. The second compromise was a combination of five bills, and it also dealt with strict laws directing the return of runaway slaves to non-slavery states. Many Southerners complained about losing their property in the form of escaped slaves. Many of the Southern wanted to gain the upper hand on the issue of slavery because slaves were their chief source of economy.                                                                            

You might be interested in
Some people advise the use of debit cards (rather than credit cards) because the use of debit cards __________.
Svetlanka [38]
Its d because credit cards rank up debt because they don't get payed off ,debit cards don't have to be payed off<span />
3 0
2 years ago
Height and weight during rapid industrialization. economic historians have found that the average height of individuals in both
scZoUnD [109]
Because more sanatry condishions
8 0
3 years ago
Whom does Chavez blame for the problems faced
arlik [135]

Answer:

The US Government

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What was the third fifth comprimise
Nadya [2.5K]

The three fifths compromise was an agreement on how to count slaves for the purposes of taxation and Congressional representation. A slave would count as 3/5 of a person.

6 0
3 years ago
An externality is an unintended side effect that benefits or harms a third party not involved in the activity. Please select the
kotegsom [21]
Answer: TRUE

<span>"Externality" is the term which is used to describe an unintended side effect that affects a third party that had no involvement in the activity that caused the side effect. The side effect is called a positive externality if it benefits the third party, while it is called a negative externality if it is harmful to the third party.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Made illegal the writing, publishing, or printing of "any false scandalous and malicious writing" about the president, congress,
    10·1 answer
  • how might the anti-immigrant arguments of wealthy nativists have differed from those of less-affluent nativists?
    10·1 answer
  • Boumediene v. Bush was there a dessenting view?
    7·1 answer
  • In 1831, which slave led a revolt in Virginia in which nearly 60 white people were killed?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not true about Rousseau?
    14·2 answers
  • How did Mycenaean kings usually reward their warriors?
    14·1 answer
  • What showed that King Charles || (the second) rulles with absolute monarchy?​
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true about the Embargo Act of 1807?
    5·2 answers
  • Warriors from which group invaded countries near Axum before invading Axum itself?
    15·2 answers
  • ¿Qué tendría que cambiar el gobierno de México para promover la inclusión, aceptar las diferencias y valorar a las personas desd
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!