Roman society was one that constantly pushed romans to be more and more ambitious, to take more, do more and conquer more. Eventually you start stepping on people's toes who are trying to do the same thing, then you have two powerful people fighting for ultimate power (ceaser v. pompey, sulla v. marius, augustus v. marc anthony, etc.). Then there was the Marian reforms which made soldiers beholdened primarily to their general, not the state, for their rewards (usually land after the campaign was finished), couple that with legions frequently going further and further from Rome in the late republic, most Roman soldiers knew and depended on their general, and barely interacted with the state at all. So these generals gradually gained ferociously loyal armies that were closer to them than Rome in general, so they'd be pretty willing to fight for their general against another general, even when it would weaken the state as a whole. Obviously civil wars cause a huge amount of damage to their nation, both in lives and monetary cost. Plus usually whoever won the civil war would then proceed to kill all prominent citizens who even slightly leaned toward the opposing side. After two or three purges like this, many of the prominent families that made rome into a world power were completely in shambles and the bitter rivalries between them made future wars inevitable.
I believe it's when someone calls a fictional work blasphemous. But that's just an educated guess
Answer:
People be broke homie
Explanation:
The great depression didn't just affect America, it sent the world into a frenzy. Not to mention the Germans were unjustly treated. Their homes were taken and partitioned to different, new countries. They were broke already as all their money was taken, their military was shut down, and don't get me started and the food shortages. Inflation was high enough in Germany and the great depression just made the Germans even more desperate for something they could grasp on to, a small glimpse of a bright future. Hitler was their answer but soon after they got out of that mess not all Germans agreed with hitler's Third Reich.
So the take away is not all Germans in WW2 were Nazis and being broke does crazy things to people.
Answer:
Communism : Welfare Oriented ; Capitalism : Growth Oriented
Explanation:
Communism is the ideology of social organisation : which states that resources should be owned, managed, distributed by community.
Capitalism is the socio economic, political system, in which resources are privately owned. They are managed & distributed as per market driven interests.
Communism is a theory focusing on human welfare, Capitalism is a theory focusing on profit maximisation. Their ulterior guiding motives make them battling concepts. As, communism theorists argue against capitalism, that it is against social justice. Capitalism theorists argue against communism, that it is against growth.
A solution to winning this battle by a mediator approach is : Mixed Economy model, which includes the positive characteristics of both the models. It strikes the balance between growth & welfare objective.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be through a "mutual understanding," since this was the purpose of the Berlin Conference. </span></span>
