0.32 x 133
=42.56
:) hope that helps
The best answer from the options that proves that the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data is: ( Statement 1 ) Yes, because the points have no clear pattern
X Given Predicted Residual value
1 3.5 4.06 -0.56
2 2.3 2.09 0.21
3 1.1 0.12 0.98
4 2.2 -1.85 4.05
5 -4.1 -3.82 -0.28
The residual value is calculated as follows using this formula: ( Given - predicted )
1) ( 3.5 - 4.06 ) = -0.56
2) ( 2.3 - 2.09 ) = 0.21
3) ( 1.1 - 0.12 ) = 0.98
4) (2.2 - (-1.85) = 4.05
5) ( -4.1 - (-3.82) = -0.28
Residual values are the difference between the given values and the predicted values in a given data set and the residual plot is used to represent these values .
attached below is the residual plot of the data set
hence we can conclude from the residual plot attached below that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data because the points have no clear pattern ( i.e. scattered )
learn more about residual plots : brainly.com/question/16821224
Answer:
The number is 3.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find : A number which decreased by 12 equals 3 times it’s opposite ?
Solution :
Let the number be 'x'.
It's opposite is '-x'.
A number which decreased by 12 equals 3 times it’s opposite
i.e. 
Solving the equation,





Therefore, the number is 3.
Answer:
Correct choice is A
Step-by-step explanation:
Two vertices of the rectangle have coordinates A(-1, 5) and B(2, 1). If rectangle sides are parallel to the axes, then two remaining vertices have coordinates C(-1,1) and D(2,5) (see attached diagram for details).
Find the length and the width:

Then the length is 1 unit longer than the width.
Answer:
x = c - b
Step-by-step explanation:
c = x + b
Subtract b on both sides,
c - b = x + b - b
c - b = x
x = c - b
Hence, solved.