Og

Answer the following question

wariber [46]

The following passage has not been edited. There is one error in each line.

Once there was a guru communicating

wisdom to people that came for his (a)

Answer (a) Incorrect that Correction who

wisdom to people who came for his

darsham with flowers or fruits. One (b)

Answer (b) Incorrect or Correction and

darsham with flowers and fruits. One

day, as the offerings were in plenty, he (c)

Answer (c) Incorrect in Correction - (nothing)

day, as the offerings were plenty, he

called the disciple and asked him to (d)

Answer (d) Incorrect the Correct a

called a disciple and asked him to

cut fruits and arrange for their

distribution of Prasad. (e)

Answer (e) Incorrect their Correct its

cut fruit and arrange for its

distribution of Prasad.

Correct passage

Once there was a guru communicating

wisdom to people who came for his

darsham with flowers and fruits. One

day, as the offerings were plenty, he

called a disciple and asked him to

cut fruits and arrange for its

distribution of Prasad.

$\textit{\textbf{Spymore}}$

5 0

3 years ago

Which inference is the same as picking out the main idea from the supporting details? A. Cause-effect B. Category C. Feeling-att

statuscvo [17]

Which inference is the same as picking out the main idea from the supporting details?

A. Cause-effect

Hope this answers your question!

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

More than DOUBLE POINTS!! Compare and contrast the topics and themes of writers from the Americas and European writers. Include

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Henry James was the first writer to mention the difference in a greater extent. According to his writings, American style writing is rich with moral innosence, spontaneity, sincerity, honesty, naturality respectively versus European moral experience, rituality, dishonesty and artificiality. The qualities cannot be seen exactly in every European or American novel, however the qualities boil down to the final virtue in the form of honesty vs evil.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What conclusion can readers draw about Charlie based on his description of taking the Rorschach test?

tatyana61 [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

On March 4th, when Charlie took the Rorschach Test, he was supposed to view the images of the inkblots and freely imagine what he saw in them. But Charlie only saw the inkblots for what they were: blobs of ink. Even when Burt tells him to imagine, to pretend, to look for something there in the card, Charlie can't. He struggles to give a true description of the cards, pointing out how one was "a very nice pictur of ink with pritty points all around the eges," but again, this isn't the response that the psychologist is looking for.

Like ambiguously shaped clouds in which people "see" images of people and animals, the inkblots have enough random, busy shapes on them for people to interpret them as many different things--people, animals, scenes, conflicts, and so on. The idea is that the psychologist will pay attention to what a person thinks he or she sees in the inkblots, which is supposed to provide insight on what that person thinks and feels overall.

As a result of Charlie's inability to properly take this test, he worries that he's failed and that he won't be a candidate for the treatment to increase his intelligence. And while he gets frustrated with himself during the test, and while Burt seems to get almost angry--as evinced when his pencil point breaks--I wouldn't say that Charlie is angry in this situation.

But what this scene does reveal about his character is that perhaps he's already smarter than we expect. By insisting on seeing the inkblots for what they really are, and by failing to imagine scenes and images that are false or skewed, Charlie shows that he's not just honest but scrupulous. This early evidence of his good character foreshadows the upcoming conflicts he has with the men at the bakery as well as the researchers themselves, who are less scrupulous.

8 0

4 years ago

Read the sentence. The office’s boisterous celebration, full of cheering, shouting, and laughter, caused other businesses on the

Nikitich [7]

The answer is rowdy. Rowdy means noisy or disorderly, which is what the term boisterous is most likely to mean in this sentence. Shouting, cheering, and laughter could all go under the category of rowdy.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers