1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
3 years ago
14

In the ultimatum​ game, one reason players​ don't choose the rational offer is A. they are worse off by taking the offer. B. tha

t there are too many possible outcomes to reasonably consider. C. most people believe in​ reciprocity, and will therefore get even if the prosper treats them badly. D. that it is not a Nash equilibrium.
Business
1 answer:
Daniel [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. Most people believe in​ reciprocity, and will therefore get even if the prosper treats them badly.

Explanation:

In recent times, this game has formed to be a great experimental tool to economists where a certain amount of money is been divided into two equal halves between the proposer and the other player. It is noted that at the end of repeatedly playing the game, ten times in their experiment, players almost always converges to the initial median effort level of four or five.

And in the other hand, a reasonable amount of players believe in​ reciprocity, and will therefore get even if the prosper treats them badly.

Most of this games and its forms have a set of Pareto ranked pure strategy Nash equilibria, one for each possible effort level.

You might be interested in
An investor is interested in selling 500 shares of her listed reit. the sale will be handled in a manner that's similar to the:_
Vaselesa [24]

An investor is interested in selling 500 shares of her listed REIT. The sale will be handled in a manner that's similar to the real estate investment trusts are available on a secondary market (REITs). Prices for the vast majority of REITs traded on the NYSE are influenced by supply and demand.

What is REIT?

A firm that owns and often manages real estate or similar assets that generate income is known as a REIT. These could consist of warehouses, self-storage facilities, office buildings, commercial centers, residences, hotels, resorts, and mortgages or loans.

How does a real estate investment trust work?

The majority of REITs operate under a simple corporate structure: they lease out space, collect rent on the buildings, and then pay dividends to shareholders. Mortgage REITs finance real estate rather than owning it. The interest in their investments is how these REITs make money.

Are real estate investment trusts a good investment?

In the past, REITs have produced competitive total returns that have been based on high, dependable dividend income and long-term capital growth. They also make a great portfolio diversifier because of their very low connection with other assets, which can lower total portfolio risk and boost profits.

Learn more about REITs: brainly.com/question/20372670

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
What are the ways that panera bread can conduct ethical and proper forms of competitive analysis to learn about potential compet
katrin [286]

Ethical practices means not harming the business  or tarnishing the name of the business. Panera bread could speak with their competitors regarding their products or they could decrease the price of their products

5 0
3 years ago
Tiny Corporation shows a balance in the unearned revenue account of $1,200 at the end of the month. It is determined that $500 o
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer: The adjusting entry is to DR Unearned Revenue Account with $700 and CR Earned Revenue Account with $700.

Explanation:

A reduction in the unearned revenue account implies that a portion of the unearned revenue has been earned.

Unearned revenue account is a liability account that warehouses revenue paid for but yet to be earned. A reduction in the liability means an income has been earned and recognised.

3 0
3 years ago
As the number of multinational corporations continues to grow, we are experiencing a greater number of international ethical dil
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Multinationals must subjectively determine the local living wage, which is usually more than the local legal wage in developing countries. Customers surveyed say they are willing to pay a few dollars more to improve working conditions in sweatshops.

Explanation:

A sweatshops may be defined as a factory or firm which violates some of the labor laws of the United States as stated by the US department of labor.

In these sweatshops, they provide unfair wages, the working conditions are very poor, proper labor laws are not followed extended working hours, exploitation of labor takes place.

This has been a real challenge the developing countries are facing. This can be improved as the multinational companies determines a higher local living wage than the legal wage in some of the developing countries. Even the customers of their products are coming forward and are willing to pay more for the products so that the working conditions of the sweatshops improves.

7 0
3 years ago
Access Organics, Inc., hired Andy Hernandez to sell organic produce. Later, Hernandez signed an agreement not to compete with Ac
MariettaO [177]

Answer: The Non Compete is NOT Enforceable.

Explanation:

An Agreement not to compete with your previous company is a RESTRICTIVE covenant that was generally introduced to ensure that Upper and Middle Management who were generally privy to Trade Secrets in an Organization do not take that information somewhere else and use it against that old company usually in exchange for better compensation packages.

Hernandez joined Access Organics and regrettably was not given a pay increase or any other special considerations. This is very relevant.

For a Non-compete to hold relevance especially if it is signed AFTER an employee has already being working in an organization, there needs to be SUFFICIENT Considerations that gave the employee better terms such as more job security or better benefits as a result of signing said agreement.

Andy Hernandez received no such benefits in return for signing the agreement and so the Non-compete Agreement lacks said Sufficient Considerations.

The Non-compete is therefore NOT ENFORCEABLE.

It is worthy of note that in the actual case, the Judge ruled in favor of of Andy Hernandez.

If you require further clarification do react or comment.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Flavor Food Company distributes to consumers coupons which may be presented (on or before a stated expiration date) to grocers f
    10·1 answer
  • What are two examples of when credit, if used responsibly,can be positive
    6·1 answer
  • It is important to shop around for credit because banks and financial institutions?
    14·2 answers
  • Last year, you purchased a stock at a price of $78.00 a share. Over the course of the year, you received $2.70 per share in divi
    15·1 answer
  • List and describe three causes for shifts in the demand curve.<br> (ECONOMICS)
    11·1 answer
  • David Grange is married and claims 4 withholding allowances. If he is paid biweekly and earns $1,846 per period, use the percent
    11·1 answer
  • In the _____________ stage of the project life cycle, project objectives are established, teams are formed, and major responsibi
    6·1 answer
  • Michonne Corp.'s Free Cash Flow (FCF) for the most recent year (year 0) is $730 (million). FCF is expected to grow by 14% next y
    13·1 answer
  • Select one reason a company's capital structure may include more equity than debt.
    5·1 answer
  • On March 1, Parnell Industries purchased 2 million Platinum Gems, Inc. common shares for $124 million in cash. Parnell also paid
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!