1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scorpion4ik [409]
3 years ago
9

DAILY NEWS

History
1 answer:
andreev551 [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The best subtitle for the given title would be 'Defense Spending the Exception'.

Option: (A)

Explanation:

  • Though President Ronald Reagan opted to cut the tax rates down from 70% to 50% in 1981, it had been made clear already that the military spending would not be affected at all. Despite a 20% direct slash in the revenue generated by the contemporary government through income and general taxes, the budget allotted for defense and allied sectors was not subjected to cuts and reductions.
  • The bold move of President Reagan of cutting the tax rates down by a whopping 20% came in line with the actions taken to reduce the continuously growing unemployment rate across the United States.
  • Later as he got re-elected in the year 1986, he again opted to cut the tax rates down by another 22% and brought the general tax slab down to 28%.
  • These tax cuts allowed the employment rate in the United States to shoot up greatly within a matter of 6 years and also allowed the economy to flourish surprisingly well.
You might be interested in
How was the Aztec Empire organized?
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer: The Aztec empire was made up of a series of city-states known as altepetl.

Explanation: Each altepetl was ruled by a supreme leader (tlatoani) and a supreme judge and administrator (cihuacoatl). ... Once a tlatoani was selected, he served his city-state for life.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The new american government faced several challenges. an armed protest called the
morpeh [17]
<span>This was called the whiskey rebellion. This was a tax protest in 1791. There was a tax put on domestic products in order to generate money for the war debt. People rebelled deciding that this tax violated taxation without local representation.</span>
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where was the Tibetan kingdom established
kari74 [83]
Tibet is a region on the Tibetan Plateau in Asia. :)
6 0
3 years ago
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
4 years ago
Can someone help me with the political effects of Peter the Great?
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

Peter the Great modernized Russia—which, at the start of his rule, had greatly lagged behind the Western countries—and transformed it into a major power. Through his numerous reforms, Russia made incredible progress in the development of its economy and trade, education, science and culture, and foreign policy.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were the social structures of Africa altered as a result of the forced migration of Africans destined for slavery in the Ame
    11·1 answer
  • "period in history when machinery replaced human labor"
    6·1 answer
  • Jimmy Carter was governor of Georgia from 1971-1975. He was DIFFERENT from previous governors because he Question 4 options: had
    11·2 answers
  • 8. Which city do millions of Muslims go to each year to perform specific rituals?
    15·2 answers
  • What activity contributed to the black death??
    9·1 answer
  • The philosophers of the Enlightenment hoped to improve human society by _______.
    8·1 answer
  • Which major scientific invention originated during the Tang dynasty?
    7·2 answers
  • Why might a divided government make it difficult for Congress to get anything done?
    5·1 answer
  • Which reason does Wilson give to urge Congress to declare war?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the US do the Trans Atlantic slave trade
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!