1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
3 years ago
6

Now that WWII is over, should nations still have colonies and territories or should they give the land back to the people that l

ive there. Give a reason to support your opinion.
History
1 answer:
Klio2033 [76]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Now that WWII is over, nations should not still have colonies and territories. They should they give the land back to the people that live there. They should do this because it simply isnt fair, there isnt any thing they are doing with the land, since WWII is over. There is not point of keeping the lands to themselves, thats absurd.

<em><u>Brainliest please, i need just 1 more :D</u></em>

Explanation:

You might be interested in
4. What cities on the Arabian Peninsula do you think would have been important trading centers? On your map, circle each one. Wh
Blababa [14]

Answer:

Aden, Makkah, Jeddah, Jerusalem, Damascus, Aleppo, Baghdad, and Basra were all important trading cities on the Arabian Peninsula.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What relationship did Chandragupta Maurya have with Alexander the Great? (4 points)
Lisa [10]
It can't be D. because Alexander died suddenly, not in war. Cant be C. because he died peacefully, and it can't be A, because he only met alexander like once or twice
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tell how each of these would answer this question: Where should the governments power to rule from? Articles of Confederation ,
castortr0y [4]
The correct answer is James Maddison.
6 0
2 years ago
Indians who lived in the Catholic missions in California were essentially
zaharov [31]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

had rights but little money

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Definition: a common complaint of american colonists, they felt they were taxed from england without having any vote in parliame
viva [34]
The answer is Taxation without Representation. It is an oppression definition. It was the slogan of the Revolutionary War and the years earlier. The colonists were not permissible to pick out representatives to parliament in London, which approved the laws under which they were taxed.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The most violent political change in Eastern Europe took place in 1989 with the revolutionary overthrow and execution of Nicolae
    10·2 answers
  • What was the main purpose of the Iroquois League
    6·2 answers
  • How did some northern towns react to african american immigration?
    7·2 answers
  • A history question is attached below:
    12·2 answers
  • What new kinds of neighborhoods were created by local railroads?
    12·1 answer
  • Which belief was generally held by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
    8·1 answer
  • If you had to come to a new world how would you have survived Give at least two examples
    8·1 answer
  • Muslim tradition says that Muhammad began preaching
    12·1 answer
  • Drag each tile to the correct box.
    5·1 answer
  • Read this passage:
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!