Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria. Using this document, argue that Alexander was not “great”. Alexander wasn't “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Answer:
they did not want to get involved
Explanation:
Mount Rushmore is a great monument honoring U.S. presidents.
the other answer choices are either way too specific or simply not mentioned in the given paragraphs :)
Answer:
C
answers A B and D do not make sense.