1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kvasek [131]
3 years ago
15

1. How did the issue of slavery divide the political parties in the U.S. during the 1850s?

History
1 answer:
defon3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In the 1850s, the issue of slavery formed a new party called the Republican Party.

Explanation:

The creation of the Republican Party grew out of the problems caused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The law immediately caused a political crisis for the Whig Party. Southern Whigs had opposed it: the bill proposed to open new territories to slavery. There was no room for compromise, so the party split.

The Southern Whigs were destroyed by the split. A few joined the Democratic Party. But most searched for leaders who supported slavery and the Union. The Northern Whigs, however, joined with other opponents of slavery and formed the Republican Party.

The Republicans quickly gained strength in the North. "Bleeding Kansas" was the key to the Republican rise. Many people blamed the violence on the Democrats. With the 1856 elections nearing, the Republicans believed that they had an excellent opportunity to gain seats in Congress and win the presidency.

The Republicans needed a strong presidential candidate in 1856 to strengthen their young party. They nominated John C. Fremont. Young and handsome. Fremont was a national hero for his explorations in the West, which earned him the nickname the "Pathfinder."

Republicans liked Fremont for a couple of reasons. He had spoken in favor of admitting both California and Kansas as free states. Also, he had little political experience and did not have a controversial record to defend. Even so, the Republican position on slavery was so unpopular in the South that Fremont's name did not appear on the ballot there.

Although he lost the election, Fremont won 11 Northern states. These results showed two things. First, the Republican Party was a major force in the North. Second, the nation was sharply split over slavery.

Hope this helps :D (This took forever)

You might be interested in
How did progressives think cities should be governed?
Ahat [919]
In general in the United States, progressives believed that cities should be government according to majority opinion, as opposed to the will of the elite and rich, since they were thought to be corrupt and not working in the best interest of the population. 
8 0
3 years ago
What concept of Charles-Louis Montesquieu's did the U.S. Founding Fathers adopt in an effort to avoid the rise of a tyrannical r
galben [10]

Answer:

Creation of checks and balances

Explanation:

Charles-Louis Montesquieu was a French philosopher. He was widely known for his philosophy of CHECKS and BALANCES. It serves as the basis of which the United States Founding Fathers adopt to avoid the rise of a tyrannical rule.

In other words, the principle of Checks and Balances led to the creation of three branches of government including legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. All of which assist the United States' Founding Fathers to avoid the rise of a tyrannical ruler.

7 0
3 years ago
What did Hamilton do as treasury secretary
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

" He designed a Treasury Department for the collection and disbursing of public revenue, but also for the promotion of the economic development of the country."  - U.S. Department of the Treasury

5 0
3 years ago
What product was first made using machines in factories?​
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

Samuel Slater's cotton spinner was one of the of the first machines built in a textile factory.

8 0
3 years ago
Can targeting civilians and/or their property be justified in war? Why or why not? Give real world examples from other wars.
wlad13 [49]

After the September 11 terrorist attacks, Osama bin Laden argued that Al Qaeda was perfectly justified in killing all those people inside the World Trade Center because they weren't r:eally civilians–they were complicit in U.S. might and misdeeds. Didn't their taxes fund America's CIA assassinations and war planes? As every American understood perfectly well at the time, the attack that day would not have been justified even if all office workers in the Twin Towers had voted for a president and supported a military that perpetrated grave sins in the Middle East. Or even, indeed, if they were all subletting spare bedrooms to U.S. soldiers.

Killing civilians is wrong, no matter how often those who do it insist that the humans they killed weren't really innocent. Everyone understands this truth when the civilians being killed are one's countrymen or allies–but forget it quickly when the civilians are citizens of a country one is fighting or rooting against in war, even though the civilizational taboo against killing civilians becomes no less important.

use what you need

:)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the purpose of establashing state governments that were republics
    14·2 answers
  • The anti-federalists feared the adoption of the constitution would lead to:
    13·1 answer
  • What was Douglasses connection to abolitionist newspapers
    12·1 answer
  • In which of the following were people particularly interested during the industrial revolution
    5·1 answer
  • 4 What caused the Middle Colonies to have the most diverse population of immigrants?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the magna carta chabge the relationship between the monarch and the people
    12·2 answers
  • What issue did the land ordinance of 1785 address
    13·2 answers
  • Which organization established most of the missions in Indian Territory in the early to middle 1800s?
    7·1 answer
  • When the first bomb was tested, Oppenheimer quoted from a Hindu scripture. He said “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of the
    5·1 answer
  • In the period 1450- 1750, oceanic voyages resulted in the Colombian Exchange, which transformed the Eastern and Western Hemisphe
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!