Answer: I think the answer is all of the choices
Explanation:
ans:it's true
Explanation:
its true because if A LAW IS CONSIDERED UNCONSITUTIONAL IF IT EXPANDS RIGHTS GIVEN TO
CITIZENS BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.
Answer:
The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case. Five of the nine Justices must vote in order to grant a stay, e.g., a stay of execution in a death penalty case. Under certain instances, one Justice may grant a stay pending review by the entire Court.
Explanation:
The Constitution states that the Supreme Court has both original and appellate jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction means that the Supreme Court is the first, and only, Court to hear a case. The Constitution limits original jurisdiction cases to those involving disputes between the states or disputes arising among ambassadors and other high-ranking ministers. Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
idk if that helps at all, hopefully it helps a little...
Answer:
1)-Form in which trials are conducted, heard and judged or acts of forced execution carried out. 2. Set of rules that must be respected for the recognition of certain rights or the settlement of certain legal situations (inheritance, partitions, licitations, etc.).
2)-Due process, due process. In this sense, the procedure will aim to guarantee the fairness of the justice system without touching the merits of the law. It is in this perspective that the distinction is drawn between the rules of procedure - the rules of form - and the substantive rules.
Explanation:
these are all forms of laws but they apply differently.