Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
D) declaring victory too soon
Explanation:
John Kotter in this theory of leadership explains the concept and importance of change. He basically believes that the company shall be currently functional.
By the term currently functional he means that the company shall be updated and working on with the current market trend. This means the company shall not be resistant to change and that the management shall take a note of it.
Further in the moving scenario there is no freezing point - the company shall constantly work on the new things which it can improve and excel.
Thus, final confirmation cannot be made soon as towards the change made.
Answer:
$400,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the differential revenue if Wilson Co. were to eliminate the Tennis segment
Differential revenue= $200x2,000 units
Differential revenue= $400,000
Therefore the differential revenue if Wilson Co. were to eliminate the Tennis segment will be $400,000
Answer:
d) $3,920
Explanation:
The computation of the borrowed amount is shown below:
= Beginning cash balance + expected cash receipts - expected cash disbursements - minimum monthly cash balance
= $5,480 + $56,200 - $60,600 - $5,000
= $3,920
We easily add to the starting cash balance the estimated cash receipts and deducted the expected cash disbursements and the minimum monthly cash balance, in order to get the correct value