The end behavior of the function is the one in option C.
<em>"One end increases and one end decreases"</em>
<h3>
What can we say about the end behavior?</h3>
Here we have the function:
f(x) = -ln(2x) + 4.
Remember that for the natural logarithm, as x tends to zero the function tends to negative infinity.
And as x tends to infinity, the natural logarithm tends to infinity.
So, for our function where we have a negative sign before the logarithm, as x tends to zero the function tends to infinity and as x tends to infinity the function tends to zero.
Then the correct option is C:
<em>"One end increases and one end decreases"</em>
If you want to learn more about end behaviors:
<em>brainly.com/question/1365136</em>
<em>#SPJ1</em>
Answer:
30 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Diameter is equal to two times the radius. The circumference formula is 2piR, and you can cancel the pi's. The answer would already be in diameter form.
Answer:
$4320
Step-by-step explanation:
12 divided by 2 is 6
720 x 6 = 4320
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
surface area=4πr²=36π
r²=9
r=3
Step-by-step explanation:
a short essay written by George III reviewing the causes and effects of the American Revolution. It potentially provides a fascinating insight into the thoughts of King George about the future of the British Empire after the loss of America; however, researchers need to be cautious about how they approach the essay. The words of the essay substantively replicate a published essay by Arthur Young, a leading British agricultural theorist who shared George’s passion for improving farming techniques. Therefore, before analysing the language of the piece, we must first determine why Young’s words appear in the handwriting of the King.
There are two likely explanations for this situation. In one case, Young may have shared with George an earlier draft that the King copied and possibly amended. The second explanation is that George copied Young’s published essay then adapted the words in order to help him make sense of them, a conventional eighteenth-century process for learning called commonplacing. Each scenario prompts a slightly different interpretation of how the words reflect George’s thoughts on the British Empire. If the first scenario proves to be the most likely explanation then it suggests George may have corresponded with Young about his ideas in ways that have been overlooked until now. If the second scenario proves more plausible, then George’s editorial changes may indicate how the King imagined the future of the British Empire
