<u>Pat</u><u>, because of the effects of </u><u>effort justification.</u>
<h3><u>What is justification for effort?</u></h3>
The tendency for people to rate a task or activity higher when it involves anything challenging or unpleasant. When there are no evident justifications for performing the task, the outcome is most likely to happen. Because exerting effort to complete pointless or unpleasant work, or suffering unpleasant consequences, as a result, is cognitively inconsistent (see cognitive dissonance), it is hypothesized that people will change their assessments of the task to be more positive in order to restore consistency.
Learn more about effort justification with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/14354875?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is: letter D, using reason and observation to solve a problem.
Explanation:
Renee Descartes was a French philosopher who founded the modern philosophy while Francis Bacon was an English philosopher who developed the scientific method. According to both of them, a critical step in reaching a sound scientific conclusion is by using reason and observation in order to solve it.
Observation and perceptual experiences co-existed in order to predict the outcome. In order to solve a problem,<u> the necessity to reason out is important. </u>The solution needs to have a reason in order to aid the readers how the researcher came up with it.
For example, Renee Descartes employed the cause-and-effect method when it comes to problem solving. He emphasized that reason was <u>the main source of the researcher's knowledge.</u>
Thus, this explains the answer.
Solo killers takes more lives than team killers because having team killers makes it difficult to to carry out and executing the plan in killing people, a contrast in solo killer where the killer can easily move, socialize, and execute the killing in short span of time.
Answer:
An increase in the elevation or altitude of a land mass causes warmer climates
Village industries
teachers
schools
