<span>the relationship is that they both have an x that substitutes for them</span>
Answer:
162
Step-by-step explanation:
324/2 because a square has sides that are all equal, so the area is 2 times the length of a side
128 pls tell me if I’m wrong
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
The nth term of an AP is
= a₁ + (n - 1)d
where a₁ is the first term and d the common difference
Given a₅ is double a₇ , then
a₁ + 4d = 2(a₁ + 6d) , that is
a₁ + 4d = 2a₁ + 12d ( subtract a₁ from both sides )
4d = a₁ + 12d ( subtract 12d from both sides )
- 8d = a₁
The sum of n terms of an AP is
= 
[ 2a₁ + (n - 1)d ] , substitute values
= 
( 2(- 8d) + 16d)
= 8.5(- 16d + 16d)
= 8.5 × 0
= 0
Answer:
The requirements for the hypothesis test does satisfied the method for testing the claim that from two population proportions the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine.
Step-by-step explanation:
The percentage of children in the treatment group was:
(201229/401974)*100 = 49.9%
The percentage of children given placebo was:
(200745/401974)*100 = 50.1%
The percentage of children that developed polio in the treatment group:
(33/200745)*100 = 0.0164%
The percentage of children that developed polio in the placebo group:
(115/201229)*100 = 0.0571%
The percentage difference between the two group:
((0.0571-0.0164)/0.0571) = 61.62%
Therefore:
The amount of children used for each group was almost divided into half of the total amount of children. The test revealed although very small percentages of the both group developed polio, 68.62% more children given placebo than the children that was given the salk vaccine. Therefore, the study shows that the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine and the the hypthesis test is satisfied.
