While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
hope I helped Plz give me brainiest if I helped Thanks <333 :3
The main reason why OPEC imposed an oil embargo on the US is because the US supported Israel in its “Yom Kippur War” with Egypt, and OPEC was made up of states that were against Israel, who was fighting the war against Egypt.
Answer:
requiring citizens to obey all commands and laws imposed by the government without question
requiring citizens to set aside a portion of their property for the exclusive use of the government
Explanation:
In the 1800s, there was a school of thought then that focused on the reasoning of man and how logic and rationality is the driving force and main source of authority and clamored for ideals such as being tolerant, compassionate, obedience to constitutional authority within reason, et cetera. This movement was known as The Enlightenment.
Therefore, according to the principles of The Enlightenment, the following would be inappropriate requiring citizens to obey all commands and laws imposed by the government without question and requiring citizens to set aside a portion of their property for the exclusive use of the government because these actions are not rational.
The correct option is:
Horatory.
In terms of policy implementation, hortatory techniques are those that encourage people to comply with a policy by appealing to their better senses in an attempt to make them act in a certain desired way.
This is a technique most useful in public campaigns, such as one to discourage smoking or drinking.