Answer:
answered just for the other person to have brainlest :p
Explanation:
Schachter and Singer's study suggests that emotions are the result of both cognitive and physiological processes. According to their study, individuals respond in different ways to a shot of adrenaline and that will depend on the context they find themselves in. In this situational context, <u>if an individual is uninformed or misinformed about the effect of epinephrine and interacts with an angry person, he/she will show an angry response.</u>
The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
In the years from 1900 to the present, life expectancy in the United States has drastically increased.
The tremendous increase in life expectancy during the last century may be the greatest human achievement.
In the 110 years between 1900 and 2010, the United States' life expectancy at birth increased from 47.3 to 78.7 years (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics [CDC/NCHS], 2012, 2013). Declines in infectious diseases and fatalities disproportionately among the young caused this longer lifespan. After infectious diseases accounted for the majority of deaths, the leading causes of mortality were cancer and cardiovascular diseases. In the second half of the 20th century, these then became the focus of science and medicine.
To learn more about life expectancy click here:
brainly.com/question/7184917
#SPJ9
The answer would be cholera I believe!
