The sentence that can be used as a supporting detail that the government can provide certain things to its citizens is the mention of the obligation of the government to the people.
<h3>What is a Supporting Detail?</h3>
This refers to the use of evidence to validate a given claim to show that it is true or not with the use of factual or statistical data.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, we can see that there is a narration about the government and the people and how they have various obligations and duties to their citizens.
Read more about supporting details here:
brainly.com/question/11669714
#SPJ4
<span>C.
qualifications, formal certificates, diplomas
</span><span>
E.
the results of your actions
</span>
Answer:
C.) An article from a scholarly journal entitled "The impacts of testing on students ages 6-9" published in 2019
Explanation:
The reason that this is the correct answer is that the article is from a reliable source and it was written recently ensuring that you get updated information, as well as it is going through the exact information that you need for your research paper. If you were to choose A then it wouldn't really add anything to your research paper and it would just talk about a random teacher teaching experience, this source is neither enhancing nor reliable. If you were to choose B then it would be too outdated to be useful and or informative making the text not reliable and potentially giving you incorrect information. Next, if you were to choose D then it wouldn't be reliable since it isn't from a trustable source (Wikipedia) neither is it talking about information that is necessary for making your text more engaging
<span>The answer is slogan. This is an unforgettable motto or expression used in a commercial, government, spiritual, and other setting as a monotonous expression of an impression or determination, with the objective of encouraging members of the community or a clearer target group.</span>
Your answers are:
1. conflict
2. man vs man
3. man vs nature
4. man vs society
5. man vs self