1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldenfox [79]
3 years ago
14

Give me two main ideas of Greece and Persia​

History
1 answer:
Klio2033 [76]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The empire was connected by many roads and a postal system. The most famous road was the Royal Road built by King Darius the Great.

Explanation:

What happened between Greece and Persia?

The collision between the fractious political world of the Greeks and the enormous empire of the Persians began when Cyrus the Great conquered the Greek-inhabited region of Ionia in 547 BC. Struggling to control the independent-minded cities of Ionia, the Persians appointed tyrants to rule each of them.

You might be interested in
After what battle in 1862 President Abraham Lincoln announced his intention of freeing all slaves in the Confederacy.
Arada [10]

After the Battle of Antietam in 1862, President Abraham Lincoln announced his intention of freeing all slaves in the Confederacy.

4 0
3 years ago
1. How is food in your digestive system like a finger in a doughnut?
Verizon [17]
 I used this for the answer and got it right I did this question before so their ya go
The finger like projections in the small intestine are called intestinal villus or villi.
7 0
3 years ago
Who was belisarius <br>please help i need help​
Crazy boy [7]

Answer:

lavius Belisarius was a general of the Byzantine Empire. He was instrumental to Emperor Justinian I's ambitious project of reconquering much of the Mediterranean territory of the former Western Roman Empire, which had been lost less than a century before

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might violence be tempting to activists? Why might it be risky to their movements?
Neko [114]

Answer:

We agree with a number of Thaler’s points. First, he is right to question those on the outside who tell activists what to do or offer strategic or tactical advice. Local activists know their context best, and specific instructions from outside actors can place activists at great risk. People struggling under such conditions often say they learn the most from being in touch with other activists. But when activists approach scholars or practitioners for information or resources, it is crucial to make sure that a broad range of experience and evidence are publicly available and accessible. That was the purpose of a recent event hosted by the United States Institute of Peace that featured various scholarly and activist perspectives on how movements respond to repression.

Second, we appreciate how the article highlights the role of human agency in the struggle against authoritarianism and other forms of oppression. Civil resistance offers a way for marginalized and excluded groups to wage struggle using a wide range of direct-action tactics that can be used to disrupt injustices and challenge the status quo. It is more than simply an ideal or a normative preference. We also recognize that when activists seek out support or information, they decide for themselves whether the information is relevant to their context, or whether to discard it.

Third, we share his denunciation of repressive state violence targeting unarmed civilian dissenters. It is a regrettable reality that states often respond to those who challenge state power with violent repression, regardless of which methods of resistance they use. This state violence should never be normalized, nor should false moral equivalences or “both sides”-type narratives be tolerated. Outside actors should stand in solidarity with those fighting oppression and prioritize actions that protect fundamental human rights and mitigate violence targeting unarmed dissidents.

Yet we differ on other important points. First, critics often claim that nonviolence is part of a Western hegemonic discourse that reinforces the legitimacy of state violence while simultaneously encouraging oppressed people to carry the unfair burden of good behavior under crushing conditions. Discourses advocating nonviolent resistance are in no way hegemonic, nor are they Western in origin. Over the millennia, states and nonstate groups have justified violence on the basis of its necessity, used cultural relativism as a way to prevent critiques of violence, and persecuted, imprisoned, and executed those who have advocated nonviolent approaches, which threaten two hegemonic discourses—the state’s monopoly on power, and the normalcy and necessity of violence.

Nonviolent resistance has been a counterhegemonic force that challenges both of these dominant discourses. The technique was developed and embraced by people living under colonial regimes throughout the global south, as well as by marginalized and oppressed communities within the West. Despite their views that violence was preferable to passivity, practitioners such as Mohandas Gandhi and Badshah Khan saw mass civil resistance as the only way for them to challenge the violence of Western imperialism on pragmatic grounds. Over the course of the past century, the technique spread from the global south to the United States and Europe, where people fighting racism, sexism, poverty, war, authoritarianism, and economic inequality have seen the strategic value of fighting structural violence by building and wielding inclusive power from below using nonviolent resistance.

Activists from around the world continue to make arguments about the strategic utility of nonviolent resistance, without any nudging from Westerners or Western researchers. Protesters facing a massive crackdown in Baghdad attempted to maintain nonviolent discipline by shouting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” while under fire from security forces. Women in Lebanon have organized human chains to maintain nonviolent discipline in the ongoing movement there, which is now in a particularly delicate phase. Dissidents associated with the Sudanese Revolution insisted on maintaining a remarkable level of nonviolent discipline, despite bloody crackdowns attempting to throw the transition into disarray. And in Algeria, the ongoing movement there has remained both disruptive and restrained in its use of violence.

Our book, Why Civil Resistance Works, presents evidence that mass, broad-based participation is critical to movement success and that movements that rely primarily on nonviolent tactics tend to enjoy more diverse participation, which in turn yields a number of political advantages for the campaign. Updated analyses reinforce these earlier findings, and other research helps to unpack these dynamics at a more granular level.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What 3 things did Egyptians bring back from Nubia?
STatiana [176]
The Egyptians traded many items with Nubia. Three of the things they brought back from Nubia were:1. Gold2. Slaves3. IvoryNubia was an ancient region between what is now known as North Sudan, and Southern Egypt. It is situated along the Nile River. Egyptian traders travelled to Nubia by sailing along the Nile River. Because of its location, Nubia also controlled the trade between the rest of Africa and Egypt. The Egyptians eventually conquered the Nubians and called it the land of Kush. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Paraphrase this for me please. 15 points because it is pretty short. I'll also mark brainliest!
    15·1 answer
  • How did the European redrawing of territorial boundaries according to Western colonial needs affect Africans? A. It aided in the
    10·2 answers
  • Da Vinci was considered the ideal "Renaissance man" because he studied
    6·2 answers
  • What did Muhammad's first revelation instruct all Muslims to do?
    6·2 answers
  • 3. What happens to unwanted Athenian and Spartan babies
    11·2 answers
  • What country is to the South of United States
    5·2 answers
  • Del Rio, Texas is a city on the border of Mexico that is considered a “gateway” to Mexico.
    9·2 answers
  • During the Second Industrial Revolution, railroad expansion increased settlement in
    5·2 answers
  • The government of the Directory became known mainly for ______ and began to rely on the to ______ stay in power.
    12·1 answer
  • The North European Plain has an abundance of what resources
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!