Answer:
I haven't read it so I can only guess based on what you've shown us. It sounds as though earlier on in the story, Annemarie wanted to be involved in some sort of potentially dangerous activity. Later on, I assume she witnessed someone else get hurt or realized the true danger of the activity and realized she's actually glad she isn't involved in a harmful way. The inference I can make is that her opinion on the dangerous activity, whatever it may be, has changed due to someone or something else's suffering.
This might not even be correct since I don't know what the reading is from, but I hope this at least helps you make your own inference of whatever the reading was.
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
A slippery slope fallacy simply has to do with making claims about several events which eventually leads to a bad result in the end.
A good example is the legalization of prostitution. When this is done, there'll be an increase in divorce and this also leads to the breakdown of the family affected. This shows how a series of events led to an awkward outing in the end.
Answer: Sad and/or upset
Explanation:
This person seems like it is very sad therefore it gives it the sad and upset tone.
Answer:
Now that Jonas can ask questions, he realizes how overwhelming it can be for one person to receive so much information.
Explanation:
Jonas discovers all the truths about human behavior. Being able to ask questions and now have access to the memories, he is overwhelmed by all these new feelings.
Some are pleasant, but others not so much. And this helps him understand why everyone else in the community is not allowed to ask questions.
Each of these memories completely overwhelms Jonas who does not understand very well what he is seeing, since it is something new to him.
Let's look at the following quote:
<em>"There was a question bothering Jonas. "Sir," he said, "The Chief
</em>
<em>Elder told me - she told everyone - and you told me, too, that it
</em>
<em>would be painful. So I was a little scared"</em>
