The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the options for this question.
However, trying to help you we can say the following.
The statement that best summarizes the Court's ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is "Schools should not use racial quotas, but they can still consider race when admitting students."
The Regents of the University of California v Bakke changed affirmative action policies in that it struck down the use of strict racial quotas.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a Supre Court case of October 12, 1977, and decided on June 26, 1978. Alan Bakke had been rejected twice by the University of California Medical School at Davis. The University reserved 16 places for “minorities.” But Bakke had better marks than the minorities students admitted. The Supreme Court agreed that the University’s use of racial quotas was against the Constitution and ordered the University to accept Bakke.
Answer:
African Americans were still segregated from White people and did not have the same rights.
Explanation:
Even after slavery ended, African Americans were segregated (schools, bathrooms, water fountains, buses, etc.). They also were not allowed to vote until the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Discrimination against African Americans was allowed and continued to happen until the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Other reasons: After slavery ended, many African Americans were unable to find jobs after they were set free. This led them into sharecropping, which was effectively like slavery. They could live as tenants on a landowners land to farm, and the landowner then took a share of these crops. Most of the time, African Americans were forced to extensively work to farm, and had most of their crops taken away by landowners afterward, so they were making little income.
Senate dais and advise the presiding officer on the conduct and senate business