Answer:
558.036 lb
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x is the amount of the sea water to collect 125 lb of sea salt
As given: 64 lb/ft³ has 0.0035 dissolved salt by weight
So the formula to find out the amount of the sea water is:
64 lb/ft³ * 0.0035 *x ft³ = 125 lb
<=> x = 
= 558.036 lb
Hope it will find you well.
Ok so <span>Interest = Principle * rate * time
P = 10,000
R = 3% = 0.03
T (we need to solve for t
I = 3600
now we sub..
3600 = (10,000)(0.03)(t)
3600 = 300t -- divide both sides by 300
3600/300 = t
12 = t
check..
I = prt
3600 = (10000)(0.03)(12)
3600 = (300)(12)
3600 = 3600 (correct)
It would take 12 years</span>
2x + 5 = 3x - 45 [alternate interior angles]
3x - 2x = 5 + 45
x = 50
4y - 1 + 2x + 5 = 180 [supplementaly angles]
4y + 2(50) + 4 = 180
4y + 100 = 176
4y = 76
y = 19
These are not similar. For them to be similar, they need to exist in proportion to each other for every single side. The ratio of the 12:9 sides is 4:3 when reduced. The ratio of the other 2 sides is 5:3. They all have to have the same ratio for them to be similar.
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
