Here we go..
These questions deal with opinion and perspective supplied by facts, so if this is purely academic there is no perfect answer. In my opinion, yes imperial rule has always been bad. There are positive things about empires, that is what makes them interesting. There are pros and cons, but often that not (speaking in both modern and recent times) the pros are supposed to blot out the cons. The Roman Empire is an ancient example, so yeah those pros weren't mean to blot out the cons. Never forget this, most pros of the imperial government are to make 'managing' easier. If the people dont want to be ruled by a foreign power, then youll get what you always have. Riots and whatnot. Ha, flip open any area of a text book and youll find the answer to "What is a lot or half the people dont want the imperialism?" Listen, there is no such thing as a completely good anything. But also, never let that be an excuse for injustice. Whether or not you judge yours or someone elses empire as good depends on you really, how you feel what you want, your morals. And if you want specific examples - I have plenty. But I am tired of typing now so if you want examples just msg me. Hope I helped
I'm pretty sure the answer for this is:
C. A philosophy of government that advocates for a strong central government
Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
Early in 1776, King George consented to the hiring of thousands of Hessian mercenaries to assist the British troops already in America in crushing the rebellion. ... The Revolutionary War lasted nearly eight years, largely because King George refused to surrender the colonies.
Explanation:
(please put this in your own words)
Answer:
Napoleon was a cunning, ruthless, and a skilled military strategist who effectively declared war against numerous coalitions of European nations and extended his empire.
Explanation:
Napoleon Bonaparte, born in 1769, was a French military and political leader who rose to power during the French revolution. He crowned himself emperor in 1804, after securing political authority in France in a coup d'état in 1799. From his most great accomplishments, one was the Napoleonic Code, which has standardized the French legal system. It systemized to civil code including subjects such as colonial relations, property, family, and human rights. On 21 October 1805, the Battle Of Trafalgar contested along the coast of southwest Spain between Britain's Royal Navy and Napoleonic France and Spain's combined fleets. the victory of the Royal Navy halted ambitious France under Napolean.
Answer:
If you mean the Missouri Compromise...it means that there'll be an invisible 36'30 degree parallel line that'll divide the South territory of the U.S. (South Carolina, North Carolina, Maryland, Kentuck, etc.) and the North territories of the US (New England, Ohio, Pennsylvannia, etc). The purpose of that divison is to decided witch state will have slave and which will have no slave. Any states that comes into the US below the 36'30 parallel line will become a slave state, and those above the line will be a free state. This will maintain the balance in the government between southern and northern represenatives. It also gave more power to the federal goverment as they can decided wheter or not to let a state join in as slave or free. Instead of having the states choose. Hope that helps:)
Explanation:
