1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex787 [66]
3 years ago
10

What did Father Francisco de Ayeta do?

History
1 answer:
Gnoma [55]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: D

Explanation: You’re welcome :)

You might be interested in
Hamilton was a New Yorker, while Jefferson was from Virginia. How do you think that affected their views on the economy?
ki77a [65]
<span>The answer is: Hamilton favored trade while jefferson favored agriculture hope this helps bye</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Why was jefferson davis important?
shusha [124]
Jefferson Davis (1808-1889) was a Mexican War hero, U.S. senator from Mississippi, U.S. secretary of war and president of the Confederate States of America for the duration of the American Civil War (1861-1865).
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a reason a business may choose to move its business overseas?
shepuryov [24]

Money. They can have people work for them for a cheaper amount of money. And work with less restricted laws

6 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP
telo118 [61]
The answer is D hope this helps. Also hope i get brainliest plz
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vikentia [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

FDR's mandate as a first-term President was clear and challenging: rescue the United States from the throes of its worst depression in history. Economic conditions had deteriorated in the four months between FDR's election and his inauguration. Unemployment grew to over twenty-five percent of the nation's workforce, with more than twelve million Americans out of work. A new wave of bank failures hit in February 1933. Upon accepting the Democratic nomination, FDR had promised a "New Deal" to help America out of the Depression, though the meaning of that program was far from clear.

In trying to make sense of FDR's domestic policies, historians and political scientists have referred to a "First New Deal," which lasted from 1933 to 1935, and a "Second New Deal," which stretched from 1935 to 1938. (Some scholars believe that a "Third New Deal" began in 1937 but never took root; the descriptor, likewise, has never gained significant currency.) These terms, it should be remembered, are the creations of scholars trying to impose order and organization on the Roosevelt administration's often chaotic, confusing, and contradictory attempts to combat the depression; Roosevelt himself never used them. The idea of a "first "and "second" New Deal is useful insofar as it reflects important shifts in the Roosevelt administration's approach to the nation's economic and social woes. But the boundaries between the first and second New Deals should be viewed as porous rather than concrete. In other words, significant continuities existed between the first and second New Deals that should not be overlooked.

One thing is clear: the New Deal was, and remains, difficult to categorize. Even a member of FDR's administration, the committed New Dealer Alvin Hansen, admitted in 1940 that "I really do not know what the basic principle of the New Deal is." Part of this mystery came from the President himself, whose political sensibilities were difficult to measure. Roosevelt certainly believed in the premises of American capitalism, but he also saw that American capitalism circa 1932 required reform in order to survive. How much, and what kind of, reform was still up in the air. Upon entering the Oval Office, FDR was neither a die-hard liberal nor a conservative, and the policies he enacted during his first term sometimes reflected contradictory ideological sources.

This ideological and political incoherence shrank in significance however, next to what former Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes described as a "first class temperament," exemplified by the President's optimism, self-confidence, pragmatism, and flexibility. Above all, FDR was an optimist, offering hope to millions of Americans who had none. His extreme self-confidence buoyed an American public unsure of the future or even present course. This intoxicating mix made FDR appear the paragon of leadership, a father-figure who reassured a desperate nation in his inaugural address that "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself." FDR also brought to the White House a pragmatic approach to governance. He claimed he would try something to end the depression, and if it worked he would move on to the next problem. If it failed, he would assess the failure and try something else.

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • On what basis did the u.s. supreme court strike down the national industrial recovery act (nira) in the schechter v. united stat
    6·1 answer
  • Public Domain Ethics, Politics, and Culture, a 15th century painting of a market in the Netherlands Analyze the painting, focusi
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes Mexico's policy on slavery in teaxs
    8·2 answers
  • What was the eisenhower doctrine
    5·2 answers
  • Do you think there are any situations where it is acceptable to hold an opinion that isn't based on fact but on personal experie
    15·1 answer
  • 1.Why weren't many colonial Americans concerned about protecting natural resources ? Helppp
    9·1 answer
  • What is the song Strange Fruit about?
    12·1 answer
  • Why would a leader in the Cold War era be motivated to continue the fight in Vietnam?
    13·2 answers
  • What does Bolívar suggest that Spain stop doing?
    15·1 answer
  • When did World War II end in Europe?<br><br> 1945<br> 1942<br> 1941<br> 1952
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!