Answer:
I believe it is: Li's speech is more effective because it uses visuals of maps and timelines.
Explanation:
Li gave evidence of freedom. While Jackie just repeated phrases over and over again. Jackie's Speech could've sounded like this:
"Freedom is good. Freedom gives people opportunities. Freedom is good because it gives people opportunities. Freedom makes people happy. Freedom is good to make people happy."
Do you see how boring that is? Jackie is just repeating over and over again that "freedom is good."
On the other hand, Li could have something like this: (Please note I just made up the dates to state my point)
"Back in 1745, slaves were kept as.. well slaves. It was not right. So Abraham Lincoln decided to free them. (Here Li would show a graph of how happy the African Americans became after they were free.) Do you see how the happy bar increased?"
Li's speech is waaay more interesting. I hope I have helped! :)
Answer:
by misrepresenting the causes of the conflict to gain the reader’s sympathy
Explanation:
I got it right
