Answer: A)
B) 75%
C) She bought 1.5 dozen of plain bagels and 0.5 dozen of sesame bagels.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: The ratio of the number of sesame bagels to the number of plain bagels is 1:3.
Let the number of sesame bagels be x and the number of plain bagels be 3x.
Then total bagels=x+3x=4x
A) The fraction of bagels are plain
B) The percent of bagels are plain
C) If ill bought 2 dozen bagels, the number of plain bagels
The number of sesame bagels
Hence, she bought 1.5 dozen of plain bagels and 0.5 dozen of sesame bagels.
your welcome ;)
For this case we have the following scenario:
Carlos enrolled in a gym to play sports. Carlos pays a fee for the registration and must pay 1 dollar for each day he trains in the gym. Write an equation that models the problem.
The equation that models the problem is:
y = x + 1.
The slope of the line is 1 and represents the payment of 1 dollar for each day trained.
The intersection with the y axis is 1 and represents the payment of 1 dollar for the initial inscription.
Answer:
A) 0.303
The probability that a randomly selected student from the class has brown eyes , given they are male
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Explanation</u>:-
Given data
Brown Blue Hazel Green
Females 13 4 6 9
Males 10 2 9 12
<em>Let 'B' be the event of brown eyes </em>
<em>Total number of males n(M) = 33</em>
Let B/M be the event of randomly selected student from the class has brown eyes given they are male
<em>The probability that a randomly selected student from the class has brown eyes , given they are male</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em>From table the brown eyes from males = 10</em>
<u>Final answer</u>:-
The probability that a randomly selected student from the class has brown eyes , given they are male
Answer:
¬(W∨S)→¬(J∨E)
D→(B∨C)
X is true
No
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses "neither water nor soft drinks can quench your thirst" translates to ¬(W∨S) ("neither nor" negates the disjunction W∨S). The "if,... then" translates to the implication symbol (arrow). The conclusion "juice will not do it, unless the juice contains electrolytes" translates to ¬(J∨E). This is because if J or E were true, then J would be true (because E implies J), contrary to the conclusion that J is false ("juice will not do it"), then J∨S is false.
The hypothesis here is "the dyer breaks" hence D is the hypothesis. The conclusion is "we will hang the clothes to dry, or take the clothes to a coin-operated laundry" which is the same as (B∨C).
The proposition p→p is always true (according to truth tables). In this case, p:=X is true, then p is true and X is true.
X∨Y is false if and only if X is false and Y is false, so both statements X,Y must be false.
