The evidence that weaken the counter claim in this paragraphs is the one stated in option D. Option D is the correct answer. The statement implies that the internet both invades and compromise an individual's right to privacy. This statement weakens the position of the writer.
This statement is actually false. Records indicate that, unlike women from other major ancient societies, such as Greece, their rights were nearly the same as the men's rights, and they could even rule the country - Hatshepsut and Nefertiti were exceptional Egyptian rulers. Although most non-elite women did not hold jobs outside the home, they could, for example, work as weavers, perfume makers and entertainers, they could be seen with men in public, they could remarry and divorce, they could sign contracts, they could own a business, they could own, acquire and dispose of property, and they could appear in court as witnesses.
Well colonial America had a lot less people and pretty much no government, so you would pretty much be able to do whatever you want, short of major offenses and get away with it.
A down side would be, There was a lot of disease and you would have to work extremely hard day and night, to make a living and to be able to eat. you would also most likely have to fight Indians.
I hope this helps, Have an amazing day!
laws that severely limited entry
b, did not suffer any major wars