This question refers to the text "An Apprenticeship Agreement from 1250" from the lesson <em>The Rise of Europe</em>.
In this text, we are able to see an agreement that was drafted between Ouede Ferconne and Matthew Haimart. In this agreement, Ferconne states that she agrees that her son Michael will become the apprentice of Haimart for four years in order to become a weaver. However, after two years, Ferconne will be able to legally purchase her son back.
There are several reasons why Ferconne might want to buy Michael back. Michael might not like the profession, and he might wish to change it. Moreover, Michael might be unhappy with Haimart. Michael might also believe that he has learned enough after two years, and that four are unnecessary. All of these reasons could lead Ferconne to purchase Michael back.
The two things that this three countries have in common are that they are all predominantly Christian countries, and that all three of them have access to sea.
Mexico, Finland, and Ghana, are all predominantly Christian countries. They all fall into different branches of Christianity though, and the percentages vary, with Mexico having the highest, and Ghana the smallest percentage of the population practicing this religion.
All of the countries mentioned have access to sea. This has been and still is very important for their economic development because they are all able to dictate their own economies and their own trade with whoever they want.
The detail from the text that best conveys the message to reader that people in positions of power will <u>naturally abuse that power</u> is:
- <u>D. "Whatever power he has received, he has a corrupt nature that will improve it in one thing or other..."</u>
- According to Cotton, he is of the opinion that the people who get into positions of power will naturally abuse them as it is the way human nature is and cannot be changed, no matter how one tries to.
- From his speech, he made the statement that man has a corrupt nature that he would always want more power.
- He stated that once he has had a little taste of it, this can lead him into doing some bad things to remain in power, which leads to an abuse of such power.
- As a result of these, the correct answer is option D
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/24533070
1 = C
2 = E
3 = A.
4 = B.
5 = D.
Question:
- Briefly describe the changes that Confucius’ ideas led to in India with Buddhism and Hinduism.
- Reflect on Asoka’s region… can one person really make a difference, like Confucius said?
Answer:
<h2>The changes that Confucius’ ideas led to in India with Buddhism and Hinduism</h2>
•Confucius' neighbors in India were very obsessed with different types of debates and arguments. On the contrary, Confucius was focused on daily concerns. This was one of the many reasons Confucianism effected in a huge way for the people in India. He was indifferent to the big mysteries of existence such as the afterlife and god. His answer to this was: ''We do not yet know how to serve men; how can we know about serving the spirits? We don't know yet about life; how can we know about death?'' His new, different and deep ways of thinking and behaving were new to all people. Hinduism, as well as Buddhism, both began their existence in India since 500 BC. Buddhism and Hinduism are practiced in this country, till this day. Both religions are similar in many aspects. They both believe that the specific purpose of their teachings is to escape the reincarnation cycle. When Confucius began to teach about his ideas, India began to change their mindset. They started to practice his ideas and ways of life. They practiced much of humanism. It rapidly became a code of conduct for the Indian people, a social and political philosophy and a way of life. People changed their need for debates for harmony. Soon, Confucianism became one of the principal religions in India. Some would even mix Buddhism ideas with Confucianism ideas and Hinduism practices with Confucianism practices.
• There are many myths about Ashoka propagating Buddhism, distributing wealth, building monasteries, sponsoring festivals, and looking after peace and prosperity in India. However, he turned a tradition (Buddhism) into an official state ideology and thanks to his support Buddhism ceased to be a local Indian cult and began its long transformation into a world religion. Before him, his father began this by often using violence. Eventually, Buddhism died out in India sometime after Ashoka’s death, but it remained popular in some areas, especially in eastern and south-eastern Asia. As we can see, one person can make a difference, like Confucius said. Either it's for a good or bad change but everyone has the power to change and modify everyday ways of life as well as ideas.
