Animal cruelty wasnt the biggest of their concerns during the progressive movement
so the correct answer is animal cruelty
The term Phillip Converse coined about how many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly, is known as "Non-Attitudes."
Phillip Converse was known for being a Political Science Professor at the University of Michigan.
In one of his research which he documented in a book titled "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Public."
He concluded that normal people who are not political elites don't ideologically take policies but rather flow with the prevailing issues.
Therefore he described these people as "non-attitude" because they don't have the attitude of a typical politician.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Phillip Converse defined "non-attitudes" as many people, when asked the same question at different times, will often change their answer, often randomly.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1470181
Franklin sees as a definitive consequence of the inability to embrace the Albany design of union to forestall war. The Albany Plan of Union was an arrangement to put the British North American settlements under a more brought together government. Agents of the provincial governments received the Albany Plan amid a bigger meeting known as the Albany Congress.
Answer:
Both Account A and Account B corroborate the Panthers' account by claiming that Panthers were at pizza place on the night the locker room was vandalized.
Explanation:
Given:
There are two statements given one by Panther quarterback's older sister and the other from the Bears running back.
Solution:
Corroboration is basically to compare the pieces of evidence and observing that where they agree and disagree. Many pieces of proof that say same thing makes the arguments stronger
So if we see both the statements, we can say that both Account A and Account B corroborate the Panthers' account. Both Account A and B claim that the Panthers were at pizza place on the night the locker room was vandalized. Both defend Panthers. In Account A Panther quarterback's older sister saying that she drove them to the pizza place and in Account B, Bears also says that he saw the Panthers at the pizza place. Both say same thing which makes this argument stronger. Hence Account A and Account B corroborate the Panthers' account.
