The revolutionary movements in various colonial and semi-colonial countries, which appear in different forms but which all have a profoundly anti-imperialist character, have caught the attention of the whole world.
From Morocco to Korea they have made themselves known to a greater or lesser extent and they are of a great concern to the capitalist governments, which realise that the capitalist development in these large and quite often densely populated countries is of utmost importance for maintaining the capitalist system.
As world imperialism has developed capitalism further in these areas, the masses of workers and peasants hit by capitalist penetration play a bigger role. For a long time the revolutionary nationalist movement in China had a mainly military character, such as the revolt of the Riff-inhabitants [2], which at present under Abd-el-Krim manifests itself mainly as military resistance. As in China the capitalist system penetrated deeper, thus developing a significant industry in several areas in this large country, the proletarians of these industrial areas have grown in significance in the struggle against the imperialism of various countries. In Indonesia a massive peasants’ and workers’ movement developed even before the World War.
He didn't beleave in the pope
Answer:
C. Only white families could afford to buy a house in the suburbs.
Explanation:
A is incorrect because it technically did not ever place a "ban" on specific races being able to move into suburbs, all it did was segregate whites and blacks in schools, public places, etc.
B is incorrect because minority groups were often discriminated against pay wise and job eligibility wise, so it would not make sense that they would be the only ones that could afford housing in suburbs.
C is correct because white families were the only "group" that could afford the housing because they were least discriminated against in a work environment back in the 1960s.
D is incorrect because it just doesn't make sense, I do not believe the government has any housing financial aid in the 1960s in general.
Hopefully this helps!
The framers of the constitution intended that the Congress would play a major part in the American democracy. They left the president’s power without many boundaries, counting on check and balances as a power to hold the presidency. The framers of the constitution didn’t want the president to be a slave of the Congress, this is the reason probably the framers would be in favor of the presidency’s expanded powers, they wanted a balance between a free man who is stronger than governors but not as free as a monarch.
Answer: the correct answer is b. included establishments of new urban centers far from the coast.
Explanation:
There were many stablishments of new urban centers far from the coast as a consquence of the effort to open up the interior of the country in Brazil.
