Answer:
The president can veto any bill passed by congress, but a two-thirds vote in Congress can override the veto.
Explanation:
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
The correct answer is D- this is a tax paid by someone who inherits money from someone who's died.
A potential confuser, the excise tax is a tax on certain goods, such as tobacco.
Answer:
D. The course altered Gary's concept of psychological disorder
Explanation:
branch of psychology concerned with mental processes (as perception, thinking, learning, and memory) especially with respect to the internal events occurring between sensory stimulation and the overt expression of behavior. So based on the question from a congnitive psychologist view of point, Gary expectations were dashed after the course hence leading to an internal reaction that changes his perception of psycological disorder.
