1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jonny [76]
2 years ago
11

Assertive ---Saudi Arabia is not a follower of the principle of One vote,One person, One value Reason ---- The poor Arab men wer

e not allowed to vote​
History
1 answer:
liubo4ka [24]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Yes, Saudi Arabia is not a follower of the principle of one vote, one person, one value Reason. The poor Arab men were not allowed to vote​ because Saudi Arabia has absolute monarchy where the royal family runs the country instead of democracy type of government. The decendents or successor of the king is to be chosen as a new king after the death of the king so that's why there is no need for voting and therefore, poor Arab men can't vote.

You might be interested in
Why do teachers show political cartoons​
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

It is sometimes easier to understand a situation if it is shown to you in a very simple way. The cartton makes you focus on a speific aspect, and you don't get disctracted by other things. Or it's just more entertaining.

~Good day!

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is the 1890 event that is generally considered the last major conflict between American Indians and the U.S. Army
Andrej [43]
<span>Wounded Knee Massacre</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For how many years did Rome rule the civilized Western World?
Trava [24]
Rome ruled the western world for about 1000 years
8 0
3 years ago
What was the cause of shay's rebellion? what was its effect in our government?
Pachacha [2.7K]

The rebels during shay's rebellion were ex-Revolutionary War soldiers turned farmers. They opposed state economic policies causing poverty and property foreclosures. This rebellion definitely gave more power to the federal government to keep states in order. It also brought fear to the delegates making them believe the country would fall into anarchy.

Hope this helps

8 0
3 years ago
Wealthy Spanish landowners kept indigenous workers on their states through a system of
Alik [6]

Answer:

Encomiendas.

Explanation:

A Spanish landowner received a number of Indians as slave work force. They had to work in the fields for their lord. In exchange, the Spanish <em>señor</em> was responsible for keeping them  and for their evangelization. The lord was the <em>encomendero</em> and the system was the <em>encomienda. "</em>Encomendar" means to entrust. <em> </em>

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What law came out of the compromise of 1850? What did the law do?
    10·1 answer
  • All of the following are principles that help guide historians in their work EXCEPT which one?
    14·2 answers
  • When did the colonial times end
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these was a result of the Law of Return of 1950?
    14·1 answer
  • How was the U.S. Constitution changed to proteHow was the U.S. Constitution changed to protect people's rights?ct people's right
    14·1 answer
  • 1. How did the US coastline provide an advantage for the South during the Civil War?
    13·2 answers
  • Who died on 8/28/2020<br><br> *hint: was the greatest actor to ever live
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes an economic effect of European imperialism in Africa
    12·2 answers
  • I need help with this ASAP: How do you think fear can lead people to accept policies or actions that restrict the rights of spec
    15·2 answers
  • Germany stated that which of the following
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!