The Mayans made striking advances in writing, astronomy, and architecture. Both the Mayans and the Aztecs created highly accurate calendars. The Aztecs adapted earlier pyramid designs to build massive stone temples. The Incas showed great skill in engineering and in managing their huge empire. Aztec education was an important part of their culture. The Aztecs were very advanced scientific thinkers and mathematicians for their time. The Aztec number system was far more advanced than any other cultures at the time. In addition, Aztec science relied heavily on math. Which is why their calendars were highly accurate.
<span>Confucius was a teacher and an influential
Chinese philosopher. He was also a political figure famous for his known aphorisms
and social interaction models. Confucius is not just known to Chinese people.
He was known worldwide for his golden
rule: "Do not impose on others what you do not wish for yourself." This guiding principle of life was taught by Confucius
to his followers. </span>
His philosophy as an educator focuses on
what he called “Six Arts”: Calligraphy, Archer, Computation, and Music, ritual
and chariot-driving.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A: enrolling in different type of school is not very relevant to politics
C: When she decides not to vote "does not make a difference", she didn't participate.
D: moving into other places is not very relevant to politics
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
