A whole number that would support Cindys claim would be 2 because if u do the ,math it would be 8/24 which would be .333 repeating which is simplify to 1/3 and i do not know a number that would not work
I don’t see a diagram, but I assume that you must use these things.
Opposite interior angles. (Which are equal)
Same side interior angles (which are supplementary or they add up to 180)
Corresponding angles (which are equal)
Vertical angles (which are equal)
Answer:
5 bags of brand x and 6 bags of brand y.
Step-by-step explanation:
Nutrient requirement for the garden:
39 pounds of nutrient a and
16 pounds of nutrient b
Component of each bag of brand x:
3 pounds of nutrient a and 2 pounds of nutrient b
Therefore, 5 bags of brand x will contain 15 pounds of nutrient a and 10 pounds of nutrient b
Component of each bag of brand y:
4 pounds of nutrient a and 1 pound of nutrient b
Therefore, 6 bags of brand y will contain 24 pounds of nutrient a and 6 pounds of nutrient b
Altogether, she should buy 5 bags of brand x and 6 bags of brand y to meet the nutrient requirement of the garden
The answer would be <QRZ
Since you are looking for an angle congruent to <UQR using the alternate interior angles theorem, interior suggests that the angle must be inside the parallel lines, se we can get rid of options <WRT and <TRZ since they are exterior angles
Furthermore, in the alternate interior angles theorem, the two angles must be alternate or opposite of each other which would show that the only possible answer would be <QRZ
hope this helped!
