I strongly believe the defendents of George Floyd's case should be tried seperatrely. It would be extremely unwise to have them tried them together. If merely two white men together have the ability to murder someone and (<em>almost</em>) get away with it, then together in court they could do far worse. White supremecy is unjust and segregated. In court, every detail matters, as it will affect the defendent's outcome. By allowing white supremecy to get the upper hand by doubling it (this by having two defendents), the facts will be shifted and altered tremendously to support the side of the defendent, and the defendents' outcome will be unjustified.
Hope this helps!
I love writing stuff like this, it feels good. Plus, this took me like 5 minutes :P
Answer:
all of the above
Explanation:
learning skill is to hear,retain and then interpret what is being said
Answer:
A. Makes it ilegal for juvenile offenders who murdered to be sentenced to life without parole
Explanation:
Supreme Court established a process in which to waive juveniles to adult court. This process was required to adhere to certain constitutional safeguards, which include the right to a waiver hearing.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June 2012 that juveniles convicted of murder cannot be subject to a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
