1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marishachu [46]
3 years ago
8

What should you do if you see a weapon in the suspect's waistband during a felony traffic stop?

Law
1 answer:
Viktor [21]3 years ago
4 0

I am answering this from experience. If you stop a car and you know that the person driving has a felony first of all a felon is not allowed to carry a weapon or have one in his or or presents at all times if they are cought with one they go to jail.  Secondly if I pull over someone and they have a history of Violence with a deadly weapon or in general I will call for backup. You never go head  on in a situation when you don't know if the suspect has a weapon inside of the car or on them. When backup arrives you start commanding the driver to step out of the car. If the driver does not come out of the car we walk up slowly but we make sure we have backup first. Never just walk up to a car with a driver who has a felony of assault with a deadly weapon because you have no idea what to expect. I hope that this has answered your question

You might be interested in
Hahahahaha
earnstyle [38]

Answer:

I got u bro bro

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
5. Officer Williams patrols in a mostly Hispanic neighborhood. Although he has worked in the community for several years, he doe
Mazyrski [523]

Answer: He should take a course about cultural awareness.

Explanation: In the cultural awareness course he will most likely learn basic spanish along with ways to better his understanding of their community and ways of life.

5 0
2 years ago
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
aleksklad [387]

Answer:

In order of what you said,

1. Motion for Suppression

2. Motion for Continuance

3. Motion for Discovery

4. Motion for Bill of Particulars

Explanation:

I got this correct.

PLATO gang

7 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper arti
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

3 0
2 years ago
why is brianly money hungry? why do you have to pay to see these answers? someone should make a new site!!
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

understand go to the interent

ExplanationExplanationExplanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Heidi Klum has decided to produce and sell a signature fragrance. Klum spends countless hours with a bottle manufacturer coming
    5·1 answer
  • The location where a crime took place is called the __________ crime scene, while the ________ crime scene is where evidence of
    14·2 answers
  • Aristotle and Rawls have opposing views about the relation between justice and moral desert. What best characterizes the differe
    6·1 answer
  • In Florida,what is a CTSO in a relation to career academies in secondary schools
    8·1 answer
  • Q1.Give an example of a situation when a person might be under the impression of doing a good deed whereas he will be liable for
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an activity that the FTC would seek to prevent?
    6·1 answer
  • Describe the secret that felt like a knife cutting into Brian why was this thought so upsetting to him?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a victim's right?
    7·1 answer
  • Principles of democracy
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following people is the best-known example of a policy entrepreneur?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!