The statement basically states “Books should show us the real world and not a fantasy where we are thought to believe things. It must guide us in our time on Earth.” You are supposed to provide your opinion on what you think.
I would write something like this:
Literature has been around for centuries, maybe even millenniums. It has brought people out of the depths of despair and helped them over come problems in day-to- day life. There are all kinds of books out there - fantasy, adventure, romance, but should all those books be forgotten and thrown out for man only to read non-fictional books that are factual rather than interesting?
On one hand, books should be used as a tool for living. They should be informative and contain facts that could benefit us through out our lifetime. An interesting quote is, ‘Knowledge is the key to life’ therefore reading non-fiction books will help us in the future and reflect our actions when we grow up.
On the other hand, books have been brought to life to transport a person away from his troubles into a fictional world, where they are happy and blissful. Taking away such books and reading only factual information will not benefit a humans mind, for they will grow old and grumpy; they will obtain a lot of information but they will be dissatisfied with life - so what is the point of that? Moreover, books are books. No matter the genre or the origination of the book, it will teach us grammar and vocabulary which is vital for a human to know; it will make us emotionally happy and we will still gain knowledge from it.
In my opinion, Forster is wrong because a work of literature MUST provide a scope for the imagination and it must alter reality a little but for us to imagine - for without imagination, we are nothing.
I hope this helps, and please tell me what grade you got as I would love to know:))
The hometown team won the national championship and they celebrated all around the city.
Answer:
A. Social networking is the use of sites to interact with others users.
Explanation:
A framed narrative happens when the author uses a story and its characters to tell you another story (a story within a story... a storynception). Here, we can observe a character doing a grand opening, and he starts to introduce a character when he says "<span><em>I want to tell you of a marquis, whose actions, even though things turned out well for him in the end, were remarkable not so much for their munificence as for their senseless brutality."
</em>Therefore, you best answer is option B.<em>
</em></span>
Answer:
It is true that Minimus's poem tries to make Napoleon out to be a god.
Explanation:
'Animal Farm' is a novel written by George Orwell.The novel is a fable picturizing the Russian Revolution of 1917.
In Chapter 8, when Napoleon took over the office of 'Leadership', Minimus wrote a poem in his honor. In his poem, he portrayed Napoleon out to be god.
His poem, in second stanza, said
<em>'Thou are the giver of
</em>
<em>All that thy creatures love,
</em>
<em>Full belly twice a day, clean straw to roll upon;
</em>
<em>Every beast great or small
</em>
<em>Sleeps at peace in his stall,
</em>
<em>Thou watchest over all,
</em>
<em>Comrade Napoleon!'</em>
By stating that Napoleon <em>looks over all of his creature</em> and <em>they sleep in peace in his stall</em>, Minimus's poem is picturizing Napoleon to be god. Just like God watches over all His creation, and they sleep in peace in His stall, Minimus picturized Napoleon in the same picture.
