A. controlled prices (mostly on food)
b. it encouraged a new industry
c. he set up public school under strict goverment. (military school)
d. he encouraged the emigres to comes home ( they took an oath of loyalty to France)
e. recognized peasants to land the peasants bought from the Catholic Church.
<span>f.opened jobs based for all talents</span>
The correct answer is; Wilma Mankiller.
Further Explanation:
The Cherokee nation elected Wilma Mankiller as their first and primary Chief in 1985. She had been an activist for Cherokee issues for several decades before becoming Chief. She started out as a social worker who only worked with children and fought for all issues involving children.
When she returned to her home state of Oklahoma she began her fight for health reform, better education, and a better government for the Cherokee nation. She helped bills pass to build new health clinics on the reservations, she also created programs for adults to receive their GED and then created early education for the children.
Wilma would stay the primary chief until 1995. The only reason she did not seek re-election was because of the health issues she was battling. She passed away in 2010, but was an avid supporter of the Cherokee nation until then.
Learn more about the Cherokee nation at brainly.com/question/14305336
#LearnwithbBrainly
Here is the answer to the given question above. The abolitionists oppose annexation of new western territory during the 1840 because they <span>feared admission of the new slave states. The abolition movement campaigned for no more slaves. Hope this answers your question. </span>
Answer: It was a criminal case. Justin B. Goode faced possible jail time for accusations that he robbed a video game store.
Explanation: rationale: Don’t break the law. The case of State v. Justin B. Goode is an example of a criminal case, since Justin is accused of robbing a video game store. If the jury rules that Justin is guilty he could face possible jail time.
Balance between government and individual freedom is the constitutional principle supported by Amendment IV.
Option A
<u>Explanation</u>:
The fourth amendment is about securing people's rights and freedom, the amendment is in regard to the protection of people from the state's actions that are not based upon the reason and probable cause the crime or any other kind of legal offence has been committed. It is to maintain individual safety along with national safety as a whole.
Like after 9/11 National Security Agency (NSA) increased their efforts for public safety but without disturbing individual freedom. So, both these things are opposite to balance but are possible.
