Answer:
Both president John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. worked to bring about social equality and poverty.
Explanation:
In the eyes of the lower underprivileged classes and the African American community, both men were seen as committed with changing a number of unfair conditions that had persisted in the U.S. society up to the 1960s. They were both highly respected, admired and even loved political figures and many people had placed their hopes in them to make of the U.S. a fair and better country. Their assassinations deeply affected the lower classes and African American as they realized that it would be too hard find men like them that they could follow to advance their rights.
Pros: World is more connected, people are better informed about current events
Cons: People spend more time online, thieves can steal personal info
The movement helped achieve more political rights such as the 19th amendment which gave women the right to vote and they got property rights. I don’t know if this is what you’re looking for or not
The government was divided into three branches, judicial, legislative, and executive. The federalist believed that the national government should take care of everything and have the ultimate authority, but the constitution limited what the branches could do, therefore, the federalist believed that the constitution gave the national government too much power. The Anti-Federalist argued that the constitution gave too much power to the federal government. The Federalist believed that the nation might not survive without the passing of the constitution, and that a stronger national government was necessary after the Articles of Confederation failed.
Prior to European contact, the Indigenous peoples of North America had numerous advanced civilizations. The Europeans brought diseases which destroyed much of the Native culture and killed up to 90% of the Native population.