That's a lot of questions! You need not give me the "brainliest," as I may only respond to a couple of those points for the sake of time here.
#2 in your list: In Lincoln's first inaugural address, he said: "Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy." In other words, if states could choose to secede from the union, then there was really no union and no government. (Anarchy is the absence of government.) Only if we abide by the constitutional checks we place on ourselves in a democratic republic are we exercising genuine government. Otherwise, we fall into chaos or some sort of dictatorial state. Lincoln felt that the whole concept of self-government was at stake, threatened by the South's desire to secede. Lincoln had to treat the secession of several states as an act of rebellion.
#5 in your list (closely related to #2): The states that had seceded already had caused the civil war, in Lincoln's estimation. The northern states had to respond to hold the union together. The southern states claimed to be afraid for their property, peace and safety with an administration like Lincoln's in charge. But Lincoln saw those fears as unfounded, that all states would continue to enjoy their constitutional privileges. But seceding from the union cut them off from all stability and security.
B. The Panic of 1857.
The Panic of 1857 is the first recorded economic crisis of the world.
This is because Britain repealed the requirements of the Peel Banking Act of 1844.
This act required British currency to be backed by silver and gold. Therefore giving the current actual value, because of rare items equal value.
Becuase of instant information, the public and the world immediately learned about this, and therefore lost trust and security in Great Britain's currency.
This, therefore, leads to the Panic of 1857.
A. the creation of the Associated Press
This is not a bad side effect.
C. the Industrial Revolution
This is not a bad side effect at all, however, one of the greatest advancements in technology that boosted the worldwide economy.
D. Transcontinental Railroad
Once again, this is not a bad side effect, and instead is an extremely important development in American economics.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.
Explanation:
