1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tresset_1 [31]
3 years ago
9

In his Cherokee Nation v. Georgia opinion, Chief Justice John Marshall stated that Group of answer choices Georgia had to respec

t Indian title to their lands. Indians were wards of the federal government. the Cherokee had to move to the Indian Territory. President Jackson had full authority over Indian affairs. Indians were U.S. citizens, with all attendant rights and responsibilities.
History
1 answer:
Sedbober [7]3 years ago
3 0

Explanation:

Georgia v. United States, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), United States v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515 (1832), United States v. Georgia, The Cherokee Kingdom was declared sovereign by the Supreme Court. As according Judge John Marshall's ruling, Georgia has no legal authority to execute its laws within its borders.

You might be interested in
What are some similarities and differences between the conflict with the Barbary States and America's current campaign against t
artcher [175]

Answer:

The Barbary Wars

The practice of state-supported piracy and ransoming of captives was not wholly unusual for its time. Many European states commissioned privateers to attack each others’ shipping and also participated in the transatlantic slave trade. The two major European powers, Great Britain and France, found it expedient to encourage the Barbary States’ policy and pay tribute to them, as it allowed their merchant shipping an increased share of the Mediterranean trade, and Barbary leaders chose not to challenge the superior British or French navies.Prior to independence, American colonists had enjoyed the protection of the British Navy. However, once the United States declared independence, British diplomats were quick to inform the Barbary States that U.S. ships were open to attack. In 1785, Dey Muhammad of Algiers declared war on the United States and captured several American ships. The financially troubled Confederation Government of the United States was unable to raise a navy or the tribute that would protect U.S. ships.

In contrast to the dispute with Algiers, U.S. negotiations with Morocco went well. Moroccan Sultan Sidi Muhammad had seized a U.S. merchant ship in 1784 after the United States had ignored diplomatic overtures. However, Muhammad ultimately followed a policy of peaceful trade, and the United States successfully concluded a treaty with Morocco in 1786. However, Congress was still unable to raise enough funds to satisfy the Dey of Algiers.

In an attempt to address the challenge posed by the Dey of Algiers, Thomas Jefferson, then U.S. Minister to France, attempted to build a coalition of weaker naval powers to defeat Algiers, but was unsuccessful. However, the Kingdom of Portugal was also at war with Algiers, and blocked Algerian ships from sailing past the Straits of Gibraltar. As a result, U.S. merchant ships in the Atlantic Ocean remained safe for a time and temporarily relieved the U.S. Government from the challenges posed by the Barbary States.In 1793 a brief Portuguese-Algerian truce exposed American merchant ships to capture, forcing the United States, which had thus far only managed to conclude a treaty with Morocco, to engage in negotiations with the other Barbary States. In 1795, The U.S. Government dispatched diplomats Joel Barlow, Joseph Donaldson, and Richard O’Brien to North Africa and successfully concluded treaties with the states of Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli. Under the terms of these treaties, the United States agreed to pay tribute to these states. The treaty with Algiers freed 83 American sailors.The adoption of the Constitution in 1789 gave the U.S. Government the power to levy taxes and to raise and maintain armed forces, powers which had been lacking under the Articles of Confederation. In 1794, in response to Algerian seizures of American ships, Congress authorized construction of the first 6 ships of the U.S. Navy. In 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli, Yusuf Qaramanli, citing late payments of tribute, demanded additional tribute and declared war on the United States. The United States successfully defeated Qaramanli’s forces with a combined naval and land assault by the United States Marine Corps. The U.S. treaty with Tripoli concluded in 1805 included a ransom for American prisoners in Tripoli, but no provisions for tribute.In 1812, the new Dey of Algiers, Hajji Ali, rejected the American tribute negotiated in the 1795 treaty as insufficient and declared war on the United States. Algerian corsairs captured an American ship several weeks later. In accordance with an agreement between the Dey and British diplomats, the Algerian declaration was timed to coincide with the start of the War of 1812 between Britain and the United States. The war with Britain prevented the U.S. Government from either confronting Algerian forces or ransoming U.S. captives in Algiers. Once the Treaty of Ghent ended war with Britain, President James Madison requested that Congress declare war on Algiers, with Congress authorizing the use of force on March 3, 1815. The U.S. Navy, greatly increased in size after the War of 1812, was able send an entire squadron, led by Commodore Stephen Decatur, to the Mediterranean.When the U.S. naval expedition arrived in Algiers, a new ruler, Dey Omar, was in power. Omar wished to restore order after several years of political instability and was acutely aware that he could no longer count on British support against the Americans. Decatur had already defeated two Algerian warships and captured hundreds of prisoners of war, and was in a favorable position for negotiation.

3 0
2 years ago
A group dedicated to promoting civil rights would most likely focus on<br> addressing which problem?
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

Morals and relations to the community and the right to freedom.

6 0
2 years ago
What was the overall impact of the new economic policy
Volgvan

Communist party leader needed to retreat

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the major consequences of the French revolution?
arsen [322]

Answer:

1   End of Bourbon Rule in France. ...

2 Change in Land Ownership in France. ...

3 Loss in power of the French Catholic Church. ...

5 The Rise of Modern Nationalism. ...

6 The Spread of Liberalism. ...

7 Laying the Groundwork for Communism. ...

8 Destruction of Oligarchies and Economic Growth in Europe.

Explanation:

Can I Please have brainliest

3 0
2 years ago
Which issue did all delegates agree with in the Constitutional Convention? how to count enslaved people for representation the n
Yuri [45]

Answer:

<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>

Explanation:

The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.

Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise

At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.

It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)

Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe 4 things that helped emperors control such a vast empire
    8·1 answer
  • What dangers do you think Churchill foresaw that encouraged him to support a second front against europe's soft underbelly rathe
    12·1 answer
  • Why were loyalist willing to support continued british rule but pariots were not ?
    13·1 answer
  • What sparked the Cuban Missile Crisis?
    10·1 answer
  • The constitution establishes what two courts I know that the Supreme Court and what other fourt
    6·2 answers
  • How were English and Dutch interests in the New World similar? Please help!!!!!! &lt;3
    6·1 answer
  • What rights did women in the West earn before women in the East?
    8·2 answers
  • Who did we lose in 2020 WILL GIVE BRAILIEST
    6·1 answer
  • 30 points for this help(pick any current event that is happening right now at this time . Answer these questions
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the roles, functions and importance (s) of Labor Unions
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!