The founders believed that the "division of power" in a federal system would ensure a less corrupt government.
This is explained on the power of supervision that each power must execute on the rest of them. It's an equilibrium of power.
The correct answer is Cohesion.
Unit cohesion is indispensable for a impenetrable and secure military force. Cohesion is more than being liked by others; it is the disposition to die for someone else. There are two kinds of cohesion: Vertical cohesion and horizontal cohesion.
<em>Vertical Cohesion</em> is the promise and bond of trust that has to exist between the Commander in chief, subordinate leaders, and the troops they lead. <em>Horizontal Cohesion </em>inside a present and giving unit requires reciprocal dependence in order to survive in combat.
Both categories of cohesion succeed from indestructible bonds of reciprocal confidence, trust and discipline that make survival possible under specific chaotic conditions in periods in which a war is taking place. Military direction must be instructed by leaders who have the trust of people who will live and die, sometimes, under their commands. Without the main components of unit cohesion, discipline and high morale, the armed forces would deteriorate into disorganized units of people armed with deathly weapons.
The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
Answer:Henry Clay then skillfully led the forces of compromise, engineering separate votes on the controversial measures. On March 3, 1820, the decisive votes in the House admitted Maine as a free state, Missouri as a slave state, and made free soil all western territories north of Missouri's southern border.
Explanation:Hope this helped you!
Answer:
Montesquieu - The president has power to veto a law passed by Congress.
Voltaire - People are free to practice whatever religion they wish.
Locke - The people of the United States give the government its power.
Explanation:
Montesquieu discussed about the separation of powers and therefore he believed that every political body has its own role.
Voltaire believed that Catholic church had too much influence, and therefore proclaimed the freedom of religion.
Locke believed in the natural rights of the people, who are providing power to government that is leading them.
