Answer: Sympathetic.
Explanation: The character is desperately hungry, <u>so the author uses sympathetic language to express how weak the character is</u>. Because of hunger, the weakness must be the preponderant element expressed, what is done by means of the syntax language and the speech itself: "<u>I'll work for a little piece of meat</u>."
The author uses a lot of punctuation to shorten the sentences and to pass the idea of espasmodic thinking.
This is a great example of mixing grammatic with the situation the character lives.
Answer:
"Daddy, I have had to kill you. You died before I had time—— Marble-heavy, a bag full of God, Ghastly statue with one gray toe Big as a Frisco seal." This means she has already murdered her father—figuratively. A "bag full of God" could mean he's in a body bag or that his body is just a bag. We get an image of how big he is in her eyes via the heavy, cold corpse so large that it spans the US, his toes in the San Francisco Bay.
Explanation:
It is a dim, strange, and on occasion agonizing moral story that utilizes analogy and different gadgets to convey the possibility of a female casualty at long last liberating herself from her dad.
Explanation:
Gregor's father emphasizes how well Gregor prioritizes the important things in life like work and supporting his family. This reinforces the theme regarding isolation because it stated that Gregor doesn't do anything outside of work.
i hope this help
Answer:
He uses exaggeration to make communism appear too simplistic.
Explanation:
<em>Animal Farm</em> is an allegorical novella written by George Orwell, first published in 1945.
An allegorical novella is a novella that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, often a political one. That is the case in <em>Animal Farm</em>. It tells about farm animals who rebel against their human farmer. What they want is a society where all animals can be happy, equal, and free. However, their wishes do not come true as the rebellion is betrayed. The situation they end up in is the same as before, but instead of being dictated by a farmer, they are now under the dictatorship of a pig named Napoleon.
In fact, the story is about events leading up to the October revolution (1917) and the Stalinist era that followed. Orwell was a critic of Joseph Stalin and Stalinism. Russian people wanted to bring the dictatorship of the tsar to an end but eventually ended up with another dictator, Stalin.
Satire is the<em> use of humor, irony, </em><em>exaggeration,</em><em> or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. </em>
So, the correct answer is the last one.
