It should be gallant depends on who there asking
<h3>
✽ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~<u>
Hello There</u>
!~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ✽</h3>
➷ (I'm writing this in first person by the way)
The scent hit me faster than it should have and the wave of nausea crept up inside me. I ran out of the classroom and paced up and down the corridor until the feeling of sickness settled down. I decided to go the bathroom anyway to wash my hands because it was lunch next. I pushed open the door carefully.
I heard mumbles coming from inside one of the stalls. I listened carefully.
"Why couldn't I just be skinny and pretty? I'm so disgusting. I hate it. I hate it. "
Words don't seem like enough to explain what I felt in that moment. I knew who that voice belonged to. Melissa Lockheart. Also knows as the prettiest popular girl in our school. I didn't know how to feel. I'd always looked upon her as being blessed and I just envied her for being so perfect. Not everything is what it seems.
This is kind of rushed but you can edit it however you want to
<h3><u>
✽</u></h3>
➶ Hope This Helps You!
➶ Good Luck (:
➶ Have A Great Day ^-^
↬ ʜᴀɴɴᴀʜ ♡
<span>Gatto: An aura of paranoia seems to pervade Gatto’s angry, impressioned plea for changes to America’s educational system; as part of his argument, he tries to convince us that we are pawns in a gigantic plot. Gatto identifies with the students whose lives, he believes, have been ruined by some monstrous entity-“corporate society”? ----that tries to grind children down until they become docile, robotic creatures. His presentation-particularly toward the end-is facile and ideological; it can be hard to accept his unexplained, unsupported assertions. For example, is the purpose of tracking students necessarily the elimination of the inferior ones, or can one interpret it as one way of maintaining a meritocracy? A good summary should refer to Gatto’s scattershot method of argument. One might also question the accuracy of his paraphrases. Inglis’s list of educational purposes, for example, might be presented quite differently by a more conservative commentator. It is a loaded topic.</span>
The best way to revise the given sentence into a simple sentence is, 'According to legend, the founding of Rome began with twin brothers they were named Romulus and Remus.'
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
Simple sentence is the one which contains only one independent clause, meaning a sentence which can stand alone. Simple sentences usually avoid commas.
The best way to rewrite the given sentence into a simple sentence would be, ‘According to legend, the founding of Rome began with twin brothers they were named Romulus and Remus.
In this sentence we can see there no dependent clause, it has only one independent clause thus making it a simple sentence.
If we have a look at other sentences, then all those sentences consists of one independent as well as one dependent clause. This is because those sentences includes comma giving rise to a new clause.
