Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
It is true as a fellow historian Egyptians do belive that.
India was first administered by a private company called
East India Company, formed in 1600. The company had its own armies, governing
officials, and a judiciary. The country
was dissatisfied with the Company rule, leading to the Sepoy Rebellion on 1857.
The British Crown intervened and ruled the country in, establishing the British
Raj and completing the British colonization of India. Indians were again
discontented with the Crown, resulting to formation of Indian National Congress
that worked for independence of the country.
<span>
Unitary government controls weaker states in which the power is not shared between states or province, the advantage is that they have uniform laws throughout the country and having orderliness and stability. While the Confederate government is a federation of independent states where the advantage is that it prevents the growth of a large central government by keeping the power at local levels making the several states cooperate regarding common concern. The federal government’s power, unlike the unitary and confederate government, was divided between central and local government where they have their own set of rules, and officials.<span>
</span></span>
The answer that I came with was, had an interest in the success of Rome, since they could improve their status by demonstrating their loyalty to their conquerors. I just learned about this over the summer semester when I took western civilization. Roman is rich in history but then again I think all countries are. :)
