To be on ppf, the conditions that must hold true will be something like :
- Factors of productions must have increasing returns
- The amount of labor will be similar to the amount of responsibilities.
- There should be capital growth
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
The answer is B!!!!!! Thank me after you pass your test.
The oldest known peace treaty was the Egyptian-Hittite peace treaty. It is also known as Eternal treaty or Silver treaty. The treaty was signed between Hittite empire and Egypt in 1258 BC after the long war, which continued for over 2 centuries. After the Battle of Kadesh in 1274 BC, the sides sought a peace treaty because of heavy casualties on both sides. And it was ratified 16 years later that battle.
The British strategy in dealing with the New England states failed because the british army overextended his supply chain, which stretched in a long, narrow strip from the northern tip of Lake Champlain south to the northern curve of the Hudson River at Fort Edward, New York. As the british army marched south, Patriot militia circled north, cutting the British supply line.
