Sparta and Athens had similar forms of government; both city states were in part governed by elected assemblies. However, the top rulers of Athens were elected, while Sparta's were not. Athens was fundamentally a democracy; Sparta was an oligarchy.
Both Sparta and Athens were militarily strong, though in different ways. Sparta's military strength rested in its army, composed of the best-trained and most powerful warriors of ancient times. In contrast, while the Athenian army was almost as large as the Spartan, the Athenian navy was far more advanced and dominated the Mediterranean Sea.
Both city states had extremely large slave populations, with each home to about 100,000 slaves. However, Sparta had only about 8,000 citizens, while Athens had between 40,000 and 100,000. Slaves were at the bottom of the social order in both cities, and military men were at the top. In Sparta the military professionals were the only ones who had the right to vote; in Athens, the aristocrats were wealthy landowners who were also military leaders.
<span>The three European nations whom funded explorers were Spain, Portugal and Cuba</span>
Answer:
Advantages of Laissez-faire:
Autonomy, Innovation, Absence of taxes.
Disadvantages of Laissez-faire:
Income inequality, Failure to represent the interest of the entire society.
Explanation:
Laissez-faire is a French phrase, which translates "leave us along" it refers to a political ideology that rejects govenment intervention in the economy. The term originated in the 18th century, during the industrial revolution
Answer:
its actually Ferdinand Magellan
Explanation: