Answer:
Well this is supposed to be a personal thing that only you can answer, teachers usually use it to put people into groups but here are the safest answers.
Explanation:
Communication is necessary- Strongly agree
Courage can come when we least expect it- Stongly agree
What happens in the news doesn't interest me- somewhat disagree
Respect is given after someone earns it- Strongly agree
Most friendships are temporary- Somewhat disagree
Forgiveness is the only way to happiness- Somewhat agree or somewhat disagree
The answer is B I think sorry if it’s not
Answer:
1. Italian Stories ⇒ Decameron
2. Chaucer ⇒ Canterbury Tales
3. First "actual" short stories ⇒ 19th century
4.Old Testament stories ⇒ Jonah and Ruth
5. New Testament stories ⇒ Parables
A secondary source is a source of information that was created later by someone who did not experience first-hand the events or conditions you are researching.
• A biography is an account of someone's life, written by someone else. This means it is a secondary source.
Hope this helps! :D
~PutarPotato
Answer:
I would say that yes government should provide health care.
Explanation:
Start off your first paragraph with your opinion and add one reason. An example would be, Government should provide health care because reason 1. Discuss reason 1 in the first paragraph. For the second paragraph start the same way, I think government should provide health care because reason 2. If you have text then include quotes. In one of your paragraphs include a counter claim. Basically say, Some people may say government should not provide health care because (insert reason). Then say, this is not a realistic reason because..... At the end of your first paragraph write a transitional sentence such as, government has many other reasons to provide health care or something along that line. At the end of your second paragraph write a concluding sentence. For example, government should provide health care because reason 1 and reason 2 prove that it would be beneficial. One reason you could use I thought of right away was so that people are able to care more about helping their child, significant other, mom, dad, etc get better than worry about how much money the life saving procedure is going to cost. A reason you could say to not provide health care, is that insurance would most likely fight procedures more and it would be difficult to get treatments because if everyone can now get procedures they need for free, some people may not be accepted because they are not in as dire of circumstances. Overall, a general rule of thumb I use is pick the side that is easiest to support not what you necessarily agree with.
