Answer:
The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder, (2013) held that the coverage formula set forth in Section 4(b) of the Act was unconstitutional, and as a consequence, no jurisdictions are now subject to the coverage formula in Section 4(b) or to Sections 4(f)(4) and 5 of Act.
Explanation:
Poverty and unemployment were two harsh conditions faced by countries after World War I. This was especially true in countries like Germany. Thanks to the Treaty of Versailles, the German economy was ruined. This was because they were forced to take responsibility for World War I and were required to pay billions of dollars in reparations to other countries.
This caused poverty and unemployment to increase all across Germany. At difficult times like this, citizens are looking for a strong leader who can make significant changes. This desperation allowed for the rise of Hitler. Hitler's ability to rally individuals behind his beliefs changed a generation of citizens in Germany, giving them hope for a better economy. Htiler's reign actually resulted in increased pay and lower unemployment rates in Germany.
Here is the answer:
The framers made it relatively difficult to amend the constitution because they intended for all ratified amendments to enjoy widespread support. According to the text, the Supreme Court has largely ignored amendments XI, pertaining to sovereign immunity.
Hope it’s helps! :)
Answer:
if your referring to emmet then I don't think so because there would be no reason too.
