Answer: The court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, we should note that the court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
We should note that under a predominant purpose test, it will apply when the transaction involved is Mena for goods sales and not for the service sales.
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
Cost of goods sold = $330,520
Gross profit = $358,050
Net Income = $192,790
Explanation:
Cost of goods sold = Beginning inventory of FG + Cost of goods manufactured - Ending inventory of FG
Cost of goods sold = $77,810+$323,630-$70,920
Cost of goods sold = $330,520
Gross profit = Sales - Cost of goods sold
Gross profit = $688,570 - $330,520
Gross profit = $358,050
Net Income = Gross profit - Selling expenses - Administrative expenses
Net Income = $358,050 - $108,110 - $57,150
Net Income = $192,790
Answer:
a. rationalization
Explanation:
He justifies his actions stating that he acted in the best interests of the company and nobody stopped him. In the given scenario, Martin is justifying his actions by resorting to rationalization. As we can see that Martin in this scenario is trying to justify his actions which means that he is making excuses to defend himself which is non professional as to avoid the truth from the company.
Using barbell strategy, funds are allocated to bonds with a short term to maturity and bonds with a long term to maturity.
<h3>What Is Barbell Strategy?</h3>
The barbell strategy is one that explains that the best way to strike a balance between reward and risk is to invest in different high risk and no risk investment.
Therefore, barbell strategy allocates some funds to achieving a relatively high return.
Learn more about barbell strategy, at;
brainly.com/question/25885448