<span>Grain mills, sawmills, and shipbuilding were popular pursuits, and the harbors along the coast were excellent for promoting trade. Major industries in the New England Colonies included lumber, whaling, shipbuilding, fishing, livestock, textiles, and some agriculture.</span>
Answer:
self-efficacy.
Explanation:
Self-efficacy: The term self-efficacy is given by the psychologist Albert Bandura. He explains the term as an individual's belief in his or her capabilities to triumph in accomplishing a task or a particular situation.
According to Bandura, an individual's sense of self-efficacy plays an important role in the way he or she approaches particular tasks, goals, and challenges. In other words, it reflects the trust in oneself to lead to a specific behavior, and motivation. Self-efficacy is the foundation of leadership.
Based on the social-cognitive theory, one might observe that Michael is not lacking in self-efficacy.
Answer:
In keeping with the subject of the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, May 17, 2014 marks the 60th anniversary of the issuance of the decision on Brown v. Board of Education. Brown is a landmark case in which the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that, contrary to the legal doctrine of separate but equal, “separate education facilities are inherently unequal” and ended segregation in the United States. While most people educated in the United States are familiar with Brown, I would like to bring your attention to more arcane cases, with arguably equal significance.
As I wrote about earlier in the blog, the case Hernández v. Texas was decided just two weeks prior to Brown; but there is another little-known case that was instrumental for the American civil rights movement: Méndez v. Westminster. While many scholars of educational desegregation assure us that the beginning of the end of the “separate but equal” doctrine was set underway with Brown v. Board of Education. It could be argued that the beginning of that end may actually date back seven years prior, Méndez v. Westminster, which ended the almost 100 years of segregation that had remained a practice since the end of the U.S.-Mexico War of 1848 and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. The end of the U.S.-Mexico War gave rise to “anti-immigrant sentiments [that] resulted in increased measures to segregate Mexican-Americans from so-called ‘white’ public institutions such as swimming pools, parks, schools, and eating establishments.”
Méndez v. Westminster School District of Orange County was a federal court case that challenged racial segregation in the education system of Orange County, California. Five Mexican-American fathers—Thomas Estrada, William Guzmán, Gonzalo Méndez, Frank Palomino, and Lorenzo Ramírez—set out to challenge the practice of school segregation in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Their claim was that their children and some 5,000 others of Mexican ancestry, had fallen victim to unconstitutional discriminatory practices by being forced to attend separate schools that had been designated “schools for Mexicans” in the school districts of El Modena, Garden Grove, Santa Ana, and Westminster—all of which were in Orange County. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the segregation of Mexican and Mexican-American students, by relegating them to “Mexican Schools,” was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
<span>The National Defense Education act was passed on September 2, 1958 under the Dwight Eisenhower administration in the United States. Its objective was to increase the technological sophistication of the United States on the World front. Specialists thought that the Soviet Union was bypassing the United States and leaving them behind in the technological race. This act was implemented in order to correct this problem.</span>
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>d. unconditioned stimulus</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology,</em><em> the unconditioned stimulus is considered as one of the most significant factors in the classical conditioning theory which was proposed by Ivan Pavlov during his experimentation with dogs. The unconditioned stimulus is determined as a stimulus that tends to explicit or triggers a specific response automatically, unconditionally, and naturally. </em>
<em>According to the question above, the mouse is the 'unconditioned stimulus'.</em>
