The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do global cities and their global networks only pay an economic role, or can they also be considered as international actors from a political standpoint?
In a global and interconnected world, as we live in, cities and the networks that exist in these cities play both key roles, as economic generators and political entities that influence society and government.
These entities represent not only a place to live or make a living, like in the past but a place where diversity and multicultural interactions develop, generating new relationships that impact businesses, projects, and social life.
Cities cannot be viewed as isolated places, To the contrary, technology, trade, and business are connecting cities, regions, and nations.
Inscriptions written in praise of someone is known as prashastis .
Answer:
i believe the answer is unlimited health care or investment
Explanation: most of these have negative connotations. however postive and negative are in the eye of the beholder so this question is terrible.
Gabriella will most likely be diagnosed with "histrionic personality disorder ".
Histrionic personality disorder (HPD) is characterized by the American Psychiatric Association as an identity issue described by an example of over the top consideration looking for feelings, typically starting in early adulthood, including improperly enchanting conduct and an intemperate requirement for endorsement.
Answer:
That the promise was not enforceable because it was a gift.
Explanation:
A plaintiff lawyer loaning a corporate client funds who is breached of an oral contract that the client will give the lawyer three percent of the company's stock. The client later breaks his promise and denied the plaintiff lawyer three percent of the company's stock.
The result on appeal in the case was that the client promised to give the lawyer three percent of the company stock as a gift but the promise is not enforceable. The client now can deny giving three percent of the company's stock to the lawyer.
Hence the answer is
That the promise was not enforceable because it was a gift.